Last updated: 2019-12-11

Checks: 2 0

Knit directory: misc/

This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.5.0). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.


Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.

Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility. The version displayed above was the version of the Git repository at the time these results were generated.

Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish or wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:


Ignored files:
    Ignored:    .Rhistory
    Ignored:    .Rproj.user/

Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.


These are the previous versions of the R Markdown and HTML files. If you’ve configured a remote Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote), click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view them.

File Version Author Date Message
Rmd c22f73c Dongyue Xie 2019-12-12 wflow_publish(“analysis/mouthwash.Rmd”)

Introduction

In differential expression analysis, there are two concerns: sparse effects and unwanted variation.

This paper combines EB and RUV. It is based on assuming sparse effects which is an alternative to methods based on ‘control genes’.

Typical statisitcal analysis of differential analysis: 1: for each gene \(j\), estimate effect size and standard error; 2. Apply FDR methods to determine which genes are significant.

Unwanted variation may include measured variables such as sex/age and also unmeasured variables such as sample preparation. A popular way to remove unwanted variation is factor-augmented regression model, \(Y=X\beta+Z\alpha+E\), in which only \(Y\) and \(X\) are known.

Steps of factor-augmented regression: 1. Fit OLS of \(j\)th column of \(Y\) on \(X\). 2. Perform factor analysis on residuals and get \(\hat\alpha\), \(\hat\sigma^2_j\). 3. Estimate \(\beta\) in the model \(\hat\beta\sim(\beta+\hat\alpha^Tz,S)\).

There are more parameters than samples in step 3 so we need additional assumptions. One assumption assumes some genes are control genes. An alternative approach is to assume \(\beta\) is sparse.

Method

In the 3rd step, estimate ash prior and \(z\) by maximizing \(p(\hat\beta|g,Z,\hat\alpha,\hat s)\).

In the 4th step, compute posterior \(p(\beta_j|\hat g,\hat z,\hat\beta,\hat s)\).

Some concerns:

  1. Identifiability: factor model has identifiability issues. The estimate of \(\alpha\) can be considered identified up to its rowspace. So the estimates in step 3 and 4 should only depend on row space of \(\hat\alpha\).

  2. Accurate variance estimate \(\hat\sigma_j\): to make sure the estimate of variance is accurate, a multiplicative parameter is included, \(\hat\beta\sim N(\beta+\hat\alpha^Tz,\xi S)\). Then \(\xi\) is jointly estimated in step 3 with \(\beta,z\). In step 4, the posterior computation is conditional on \(\hat\xi\).

Comparisons

OLS,SVA,CATE,RUV2,RUV3

what’s the meaning of modular approach?

Generate simulated data

\(Z\in R^{n\times p}\) null samples with \(n\) individuals and \(p\) genes.

  1. All genes are not differentially expressed(\(\pi_0=1\)): Random \(n\) divide to two groups.

  2. Add signal to \((1-\pi_0)\) of genes: randomly chose \(1-\pi_0\) non-null genes and add effect size \(a_j\sim N(0,0.8^2)\). For a non-null gene \(j\), draw new counts \(w_{ij}|z_{ij}\sim Binomial(z_{ij},2^{a_jx_{i2}})\) if \(a_j<0\);\(w_{ij}|z_{ij}\sim Binomial(z_{ij},2^{-a_j(1-x_{i2})})\) if \(a_j>0\). In this way, \(a_j\) is the approximate \(\log_2\) effect between groups.