[nltk_data] Downloading package stopwords to /root/nltk_data... [nltk_data] Package stopwords is already up-to-date!
This document processes the outputs of the praise reward system and performs an analysis of the resulting token reward distribution.
Since praise gets valued on a scale, we can take a look at how often each value of the scale gets assigned by quantifiers. Note: This metric disregards scores of praise marked as a duplicate, since the score of the original is already being taken into account.
The ten highest rated contributions for this round were the following:
| Avg. score | To | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 103.0 | willyfox#1178 | for coordinating regenfarms on the shapeshift side, being super efficient in all the comms, being super understanding with our mistake & always looking for the best solution while seeing the brightside... man, I love Willy!! |
| 100.33 | Amin#2164 | absolutely crushing all product launches, fixing important issues, communicating super well, getting things out in very good timing. You rock!!! |
| 89.0 | Cotabe#4096 | being so outgoing and helping to onboard so many users to the platform, schilling hard in person at devcon, best giveth rep we have out here! |
| 89.0 | Cotabe#4096 | for becoming such a Giveth rockstar, keeping updates on track for GIVeconomy, representing Giveth in twitter spaces & calls, explaining voting so clearly - WOW |
| 84.67 | Cotabe#4096 | for representing Giveth at The DAOist and giving a fantastic talk! |
| 84.67 | Amin#2164 | for checking scripts and our math we use to keep our token distros and reward distributors up to date and with correct amounts |
| 82.0 | Amin#2164 | For woking hard on giv power and make it heppen |
| 77.67 | divine_comedian#5493 | for being an instrumental part of Giveth, pushing foward w/ opt in donations, supporting GIVpower with testing parties, leading and managing many topics in the forum - what a hero! |
| 73.33 | Amin#2164 | for coordinating the regen farms fox/xdai launch |
| 70.67 | Amin#2164 | for building GIVpower boosting super efficiently and speedy |
We can now take a look at the distribution of the received praise rewards. You can toggle the inclusion of the different sources by clicking on the legend.
We can also take a look at the amount of praise different users gave.
Now for something more fun: let's surface the top "praise flows" from the data. Thanks to @inventandchill for this awesome visualization! On one side we have the top 15 praise givers separately, on the other the top 25 receivers. The people outside the selection get aggregated into the "REST FROM" and "REST TO" categories.
Now let's take a closer look at the quantification process and the quantifiers:
To aid the revision process, we highlight disagreements between quantifiers.
This graphic visualizes controversial praise ratings by sorting them by the "spread" between the highest and lowest received score.
Please keep in mind that this is a visual aid. If there are several praise instances with similar spread and quant score, all but one end up "hidden" on the chart. For an exhaustive list, take a look at the exported file "praise_outliers.csv" .
Let's see how different quantifiers behaved by showing the range of praise scores they gave.
To interpret the box plot:
Bottom horizontal line of box plot is minimum value
First horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is First quartile or 25%
Second horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is Second quartile or 50% or median.
Third horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is third quartile or 75%
Top horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is maximum value.
Among 1048 praises, 244 (23.24%) do not agree on duplication
Praise instances with disagreements in duplication are collected in 'results/duplication_examination.csv'. To compare, look at the last 4 columns: 'DUPLICATE MSG 1/2/3' and 'ORIGINAL MSG'.
Among 1048 praises, 15 (1.43%) do not agree on dismissal
Praise instances with disagreements in dismissal are collected in'results/dismissal_disaggreed.csv'. You can further look into who dismissed and who did not.