[nltk_data] Downloading package stopwords to /root/nltk_data...
[nltk_data]   Package stopwords is already up-to-date!

Rewards Analytics and Distribution Dashboard for Quantification Review¶

This document processes the outputs of the praise reward system and performs an analysis of the resulting token reward distribution.

Out[6]:

Distribution report for round-22

  • This period covers praise given between 2023-05-17 and 2023-05-31.
  • We allocated a total of 24360.0 GIV tokens for rewards.
  • Duplicate praise received a weighting of 0.1 the value of the original praise.
  • We assigned 3 quantifiers per praise instance.
  • Praise receiver names were not hidden behind pseudonyms during quantification

Praise Data Visualization¶

Rating distribution¶

Since praise gets valued on a scale, we can take a look at how often each value of the scale gets assigned by quantifiers. Note: This metric disregards scores of praise marked as a duplicate, since the score of the original is already being taken into account.

Top 10 highest rated contributions¶

The ten highest rated contributions for this round were the following:

Out[9]:
Avg. score To Reason
43.666666666666664 yass.o#0 for her seeming unending patience in herding all the cats for the swiss association incorporation meeting
41.0 sem(🌸,🐝)#0161 for making and improving the Giveth AI bots which is going to be an epic suppor ttool for giveth
41.0 NicoBals#2154 for having an excellent buddy review call! It was a valuable opportunity to reflect on and appreciate his outstanding contributions in HR and contributor support. Additionally, I commend him for being receptive to critical feedback and demonstrating a genuine willingness to improve and acknowledge areas for growth. I'm grateful to have such a dedicated and self-aware teammate like Nico by my side!
36.666666666666664 NicoBals#2154 for always being on top of Giveth admin and more!
36.666666666666664 Cori#8483 for taking time during the Comms call to check in on the teams use of ChatGPT and continue the efforts of incorporating more AI tools into the content creation and SEO strategy... essentially increasing our output and productivity as a small team
36.666666666666664 Sohobiit#2746 for getting a project verified for the Giveth AMbassador Program.
34.0 whyldwanderer#0 for helping me every single day w/ an abundance of questions from "how do we verify projects" to "which meme is better" to "does this copy make sense". she is always there for me to provide sanity checks and I don't praise her nearly enough!
34.0 Cori#8483 for leading the comms strategy call & putting together a comprehsive notion doc w/ many ideas on how we can improve giveth comms to become more data driven and overall more f
29.666666666666668 freshelle#0 for providing so much support to WG Stewards in the process of formulating WG structure, budget and proposals. Setting up a weekly office hours call to facilitate a smooth reorganization through SubDAOification process.
29.666666666666668 makkiyzy#9575 for getting more active in teh community, taking initiative to reach out for tasks and taking on his first comms issue!

Praise Reward Distribution¶

We can now take a look at the distribution of the received praise rewards. You can toggle the inclusion of the different sources by clicking on the legend.

Praise Giving Distribution¶

We can also take a look at the amount of praise different users gave.

Praise Flows¶

Now for something more fun: let's surface the top "praise flows" from the data. Thanks to @inventandchill for this awesome visualization! On one side we have the top 15 praise givers separately, on the other the top 25 receivers. The people outside the selection get aggregated into the "REST FROM" and "REST TO" categories.

Out[13]:

Quantifier Data¶

Now let's take a closer look at the quantification process and the quantifiers:

Praise Outliers¶

To aid the revision process, we highlight disagreements between quantifiers.

Outliers sort by spreads¶

This graphic visualizes controversial praise ratings by sorting them by the "spread" between the highest and lowest received score.

Please keep in mind that this is a visual aid. If there are several praise instances with similar spread and quant score, all but one end up "hidden" on the chart. For an exhaustive list, take a look at the exported file "praise_outliers.csv" .

Praise score by quantifier -- outliers among the quantifiers?¶

Let's see how different quantifiers behaved by showing the range of praise scores they gave.

To interpret the box plot:

  • Bottom horizontal line of box plot is minimum value

  • First horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is First quartile or 25%

  • Second horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is Second quartile or 50% or median.

  • Third horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is third quartile or 75%

  • Top horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is maximum value.

Score displacement: tendency to under/over-scoring?¶

Scoring correlation: how similiar am I scoring with others?¶

Agreement on duplication¶

Out[22]:

Among 315 praises, 36 (11.43%) do not agree on duplication

Praise instances with disagreements in duplication are collected in 'results/duplication_examination.csv'. To compare, look at the last 4 columns: 'DUPLICATE MSG 1/2/3' and 'ORIGINAL MSG'.

Agreement on dismissal¶

Out[25]:

Among 315 praises, 2 (0.63%) do not agree on dismissal

Praise instances with disagreements in dismissal are collected in'results/dismissal_disaggreed.csv'. You can further look into who dismissed and who did not.