[nltk_data] Downloading package stopwords to /root/nltk_data... [nltk_data] Package stopwords is already up-to-date!
This document processes the outputs of the praise reward system and performs an analysis of the resulting token reward distribution.
Since praise gets valued on a scale, we can take a look at how often each value of the scale gets assigned by quantifiers. Note: This metric disregards scores of praise marked as a duplicate, since the score of the original is already being taken into account.
The ten highest rated contributions for this round were the following:
Avg. score | To | Reason |
---|---|---|
55.0 | sem(🌸,🐝)#0161 | for going through our GIVpower Optimism contract very thoroughly and providing us with small fixes to make, I appreciate him taking his time and committing to doing a thorough review of our code. |
48.0 | _cherik#0 | for the huge work and support developing, fixing, testing (repaeat!) everything for QF. you worked SO HARD for this launch and I have no idea how we could have done it without you. thank you so much! |
48.0 | karmaticacid#0 | WOW OMG SO MUCH PRAISE! Amazing work by Lauren to pull together the whole team and get QF launched on such a crazy timeline, fantastic work, QF is looking greant and I'm so proud of her achievement, excellent work!! |
41.0 | karmaticacid#0 | for getting QF out, while not feeling well, well traveling from Barcelona to Paris, while trying to attending 2 conferences, while jugglng everything else she does with Giveth, while, while, while, while...the list goes on and on. You are a true wizard! 🪄 |
41.0 | oyealmond#0 | for making the Giveth instagram so vibrant. she just takes iniative on this... cross-posting important messages from twitter... making videos and stories. editing them all HERSELF. I don't think a lot of people seeing this work getting done, so just want to say that wow Almond-you are kicking ASS on social media |
34.0 | oyealmond#0 | for really doing such a thorough job in guiding me how to do proper communications for Impact Quests and managing our partner relationships, on top of that she did a lot of work herself in promoting us on Giveth socials and the thoroughness really made a big difference in our numbers and also the relationships we made with our prize partners, huge help and so professional as always. |
31.333333333333332 | karmaticacid#0 | For working hard to make the QF release happen successfully |
29.666666666666668 | mosaeedi#0 | Doing such fantastic work on QF and getting it done and out on time, you guys are amazing! |
24.333333333333332 | sem(🌸,🐝)#0161 | for taking the time out of his schedule to thoroughly review the code changes to the GIVpower smart contract updates in order for us to launch GIVpower on Optimism |
24.333333333333332 | karmaticacid#0 | for all her hard work reviewing & editing social media copies, editing graphics, and everything around comms for QF and Octant! Phew, so much work and it's done! |
We can now take a look at the distribution of the received praise rewards. You can toggle the inclusion of the different sources by clicking on the legend.
We can also take a look at the amount of praise different users gave.
Now for something more fun: let's surface the top "praise flows" from the data. Thanks to @inventandchill for this awesome visualization! On one side we have the top 15 praise givers separately, on the other the top 25 receivers. The people outside the selection get aggregated into the "REST FROM" and "REST TO" categories.
Now let's take a closer look at the quantification process and the quantifiers:
To aid the revision process, we highlight disagreements between quantifiers.
This graphic visualizes controversial praise ratings by sorting them by the "spread" between the highest and lowest received score.
Please keep in mind that this is a visual aid. If there are several praise instances with similar spread and quant score, all but one end up "hidden" on the chart. For an exhaustive list, take a look at the exported file "praise_outliers.csv" .
Let's see how different quantifiers behaved by showing the range of praise scores they gave.
To interpret the box plot:
Bottom horizontal line of box plot is minimum value
First horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is First quartile or 25%
Second horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is Second quartile or 50% or median.
Third horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is third quartile or 75%
Top horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is maximum value.
Among 232 praises, 29 (12.50%) do not agree on duplication
Praise instances with disagreements in duplication are collected in 'results/duplication_examination.csv'. To compare, look at the last 4 columns: 'DUPLICATE MSG 1/2/3' and 'ORIGINAL MSG'.
Among 232 praises, 3 (1.29%) do not agree on dismissal
Praise instances with disagreements in dismissal are collected in'results/dismissal_disaggreed.csv'. You can further look into who dismissed and who did not.