Elasticity Coefficient Explorer

Now zoom in on a single, isolated enzyme obeying Michaelis–Menten kinetics, v = Vmax·S/(KM+S). The elasticity εSv = KM/(KM+S) is a local property of this one enzyme — no other enzymes in a pathway are involved.

current point    tangent line (slope = dv/dS, or εSv on the ln–ln plot)
v (Vmax=1)
dv/dS (slope)
εSv
S / KM
0 — inelastic (saturated) 1 — elastic (first-order)
Price-elasticity analogy: when S << KM, the enzyme is far from saturated and v tracks S almost proportionally (ε ≈ 1) — like a price-elastic product where small changes cause big responses. When S >> KM, the enzyme is saturated and v barely responds to more S (ε ≈ 0) — like an inelastic product whose demand doesn't budge.

Try it yourself

1. Unsaturated (elastic) regime. Set S=0.5, KM=10 (S << KM). What is εSv? Why does the text's approximation v ≈ (Vm/KM)·S, valid when S<<KM, predict an elasticity close to 1?

2. Saturated (inelastic) regime. Set S=20, KM=1 (S >> KM). What is εSv now, and what does the flattened tangent line tell you about how sensitive this enzyme is to further increases in its own substrate?

3. The halfway point. Set S=KM=5, then try a few other equal S/KM pairs (e.g., 2 and 2, or 8 and 8). What value does εSv always take when S=KM, regardless of the actual numbers? Can you show this algebraically from ε=KM/(KM+S)?

4. Reading the ln–ln slope. With S=3, KM=6, switch to the ln–ln view. Confirm that the tangent's slope on this plot matches the εSv value shown in the stat panel, the same way the ln–ln slope matched the FCC in the first explorer.

5. Local vs. system properties. Notice that εSv here depends only on this one enzyme's own S and KM — you don't need to know anything about the rest of the pathway to compute it, unlike the FCC and CCC explorers. Why does the text call the elasticity coefficient a "local" property while flux and concentration control coefficients are "system" properties? What experiment could you do to measure an elasticity that you couldn't do to measure an FCC?