The HVT package offers a suite of R functions designed to construct topology preserving maps for in-depth analysis of multivariate data. It is particularly well-suited for datasets with numerous records. The package organizes the typical workflow into several key stages:
Data Compression: Long datasets are compressed using Hierarchical Vector Quantization (HVQ) to achieve the desired level of data reduction.
Data Projection: Compressed cells are projected into one and two dimensions using dimensionality reduction algorithms, producing embeddings that preserve the original topology. This allows for intuitive visualization of complex data structures.
Tessellation: Voronoi tessellation partitions the projected space into distinct cells, supporting hierarchical visualizations. Heatmaps and interactive plots facilitate exploration and insights into the underlying data patterns.
Scoring: Test dataset is evaluated against previously generated maps, enabling their placement within the existing structure. Sequential application across multiple maps is supported if required.
This chunk verifies the installation of all the necessary packages to successfully run this vignette, if not, installs them and attach all the packages in the session environment.
list.of.packages <- c("plyr", "dplyr", "reactable", "kableExtra", "geozoo",
"plotly", "purrr", "data.table", "gridExtra", "tidyr")
new.packages <-list.of.packages[!(list.of.packages %in% installed.packages()[, "Package"])]
if (length(new.packages))
install.packages(new.packages, dependencies = TRUE, repos='https://cloud.r-project.org/')
invisible(lapply(list.of.packages, library, character.only = TRUE))
In this section, we will see how we can use the package to visualize multidimensional data by projecting them to two dimensions using Sammon’s projection and further used for Scoring.
Data Understanding
First of all, let us see how to generate data for torus. We are using
a library geozoo
for this purpose. Geo Zoo (stands for
Geometric Zoo) is a compilation of geometric objects ranging from three
to 10 dimensions. Geo Zoo contains regular or well-known objects, eg
cube and sphere, and some abstract objects, e.g. Boy’s surface, Torus
and Hyper-Torus.
Here, we will generate a 3D torus (a torus is a surface of revolution generated by revolving a circle in three-dimensional space one full revolution about an axis that is coplanar with the circle) with 12000 points.
Raw Torus Dataset
The torus dataset includes the following columns:
Lets, explore the torus dataset containing 12000 points. For the sake of brevity we are displaying first 6 rows.
set.seed(240)
# Here p represents dimension of object, n represents number of points
torus <- geozoo::torus(p = 3,n = 12000)
torus_df <- data.frame(torus$points)
colnames(torus_df) <- c("x","y","z")
torus_df <- torus_df %>% round(4)
displayTable(head(torus_df))
x | y | z |
---|---|---|
-2.6282 | 0.5656 | -0.7253 |
-1.4179 | -0.8903 | 0.9455 |
-1.0308 | 1.1066 | -0.8731 |
1.8847 | 0.1895 | 0.9944 |
-1.9506 | -2.2507 | 0.2071 |
-1.4824 | 0.9229 | 0.9672 |
Now let’s have a look at structure of the torus dataset.
## 'data.frame': 12000 obs. of 3 variables:
## $ x: num -2.63 -1.42 -1.03 1.88 -1.95 ...
## $ y: num 0.566 -0.89 1.107 0.19 -2.251 ...
## $ z: num -0.725 0.946 -0.873 0.994 0.207 ...
Data distribution
This section displays four objects.
Variable Histograms: The histogram distribution of all the features in the dataset.
Box Plots: Box plots for all the features in the dataset. These plots will display the median and Interquartile range of each column at a panel level.
Correlation Matrix: This calculates the Pearson correlation which is a bivariate correlation value measuring the linear correlation between two numeric columns. The output plot is shown as a matrix.
Summary EDA: The table provides descriptive statistics for all the features in the dataset.
It uses an inbuilt function called edaPlots
to display
the above-mentioned four objects.
Train - Test Split
Let us split the torus dataset into train and test. We will randomly select 80% of the torus dataset as train and remaining as test.
smp_size <- floor(0.80 * nrow(torus_df))
set.seed(279)
train_ind <- sample(seq_len(nrow(torus_df)), size = smp_size)
torus_train <- torus_df[train_ind, ]
torus_test <- torus_df[-train_ind, ]
Training Dataset
Now, lets have a look at the selected training dataset containing (9600 data points). For the sake of brevity we are displaying first six rows.
x | y | z |
---|---|---|
1.7958 | -0.4204 | -0.9878 |
0.7115 | -2.3528 | -0.8889 |
1.9285 | 1.2034 | 0.9620 |
1.0175 | 0.0344 | -0.1894 |
-0.2736 | 1.1298 | -0.5464 |
1.8976 | 2.2391 | 0.3545 |
Now lets have a look at structure of the training dataset.
## 'data.frame': 9600 obs. of 3 variables:
## $ x: num 1.796 0.712 1.929 1.018 -0.274 ...
## $ y: num -0.4204 -2.3528 1.2034 0.0344 1.1298 ...
## $ z: num -0.988 -0.889 0.962 -0.189 -0.546 ...
Data Distribution
Testing Dataset
Now, lets have a look at testing dataset containing(2400 data points).For the sake of brevity we are displaying first six rows.
x | y | z |
---|---|---|
-2.6282 | 0.5656 | -0.7253 |
2.7471 | -0.9987 | -0.3848 |
-2.4446 | -1.6528 | 0.3097 |
-2.6487 | -0.5745 | 0.7040 |
-0.2676 | -1.0800 | -0.4611 |
-1.1130 | -0.6516 | -0.7040 |
Now lets have a look at structure of the testing dataset.
## 'data.frame': 2400 obs. of 3 variables:
## $ x: num -2.628 2.747 -2.445 -2.649 -0.268 ...
## $ y: num 0.566 -0.999 -1.653 -0.575 -1.08 ...
## $ z: num -0.725 -0.385 0.31 0.704 -0.461 ...
Data Distribution
Let us try to visualize the compressed Map A from the diagram below.
Figure 1: Data Segregation with highlighted bounding box in red around compressed map A
This package can perform vector quantization using the following algorithms -
For more information on vector quantization, refer the following link.
The trainHVT function constructs highly compressed hierarchical Voronoi tessellations. The raw data is first scaled and this scaled data is supplied as input to the vector quantization algorithm. The vector quantization algorithm compresses the dataset until a user-defined compression percentage rate is achieved using a parameter called quantization error which acts as a threshold and determines the compression percentage. It means that for a given user-defined compression percentage we get the ‘n’ number of cells, then all of these cells formed will have a quantization error less than the threshold quantization error.
Let’s try to comprehend the trainHVT
first before moving
ahead.
trainHVT(
data,
min_compression_perc,
n_cells,
depth,
quant.err,
normalize,
distance_metric = c("L1_Norm", "L2_Norm"),
error_metric = c("mean", "max"),
quant_method = c("kmeans", "kmedoids"),
dim_reduction_method = c("sammon" , "tsne" , "umap")
scale_summary = NA,
diagnose = FALSE,
hvt_validation = FALSE,
train_validation_split_ratio = 0.8,
tsne_perplexity,tsne_theta,tsne_verbose,
tsne_eta,tsne_max_iter,
umap_n_neighbors,umap_min_dist
)
Each of the parameters of trainHVT function have been explained below:
data
- A dataframe, with numeric
columns (features) that will be used for training the model.
min_compression_perc
- An integer,
indicating the minimum compression percentage to be achieved for the
dataset. It indicates the desired level of reduction in dataset size
compared to its original size.
n_cells
- An integer, indicating
the number of cells per hierarchy (level). This parameter determines the
granularity or level of detail in the hierarchical vector quantization.
Minimum n_cells per hierarchy is 3.
depth
- An integer, indicating the
number of levels. A depth of 1 means no hierarchy (single level), while
higher values indicate multiple levels (hierarchy).
quant.err
- A number indicating the
quantization error threshold. A cell will only breakdown into further
cells if the quantization error of the cell is above the defined
quantization error threshold.
normalize
- A logical value
indicating if the dataset should be normalized. When set to TRUE, scales
the values of all features to have a mean of 0 and a standard deviation
of 1 (Z-score)
distance_metric
- The distance
metric can be L1_Norm
(Manhattan) or
L2_Norm
(Euclidean). L1_Norm
is selected by
default. The distance metric is used to calculate the distance between
an n
dimensional point and centroid.
error_metric
- The error metric can
be mean
or max
. max
is selected
by default. max
will return the max of m
values and mean
will take mean of m
values
where each value is a distance between a point and centroid of the
cell.
quant_method
- The quantization
method can be kmeans
or kmedoids
. Kmeans uses
means (centroids) as cluster centers while Kmedoids uses actual data
points (medoids) as cluster centers. kmeans
is selected by
default.
dim_reduction_method
- The
dimensionality reduction method to be chosen. options are ‘tsne’ ,
‘umap’ & ‘sammon’. Default is ‘sammon’.
scale_summary
- A list with user
defined mean and standard deviation values for all the features in the
dataset. Pass the scale summary when normalize is set to FALSE.
diagnose
- A logical value
indicating whether user wants to perform diagnostics on the model.
Default value is FALSE.
hvt_validation
- A logical value
indicating whether user wants to holdout a validation set and find mean
absolute deviation of the validation points from the centroid. Default
value is FALSE.
train_validation_split_ratio
- A
numeric value indicating train validation split ratio. This argument is
only used when hvt_validation has been set to TRUE. Default value for
the argument is 0.8.
tsne_verbose
- A logical value
which indicates the t-SNE algorithm to print detailed information about
its progress to the console.
tsne_perplexity
- A numeric,
balances the attention t-SNE gives to local and global aspects of the
data. Lower values focus more on local structure, while higher values
consider more global structure. It is recommended to be between 5 and
50. Default value is 30.
tsne_theta
- A numeric,
speed/accuracy trade-off parameter for Barnes-Hut approximation. If set
to 0, exact t-SNE is performed, which is slower. If set to greater than
0, an approximation is used, which speeds up the process but may reduce
accuracy. Default value is 0.5
tsne_eta (learning_rate)
- A
numeric, learning rate for t-SNE optimization.Determines the step size
during optimization. If too low, the algorithm might get stuck in local
minima; if too high, the solution may become unstable. Default value is
200.
tsne_max_iter
- An integer, maximum
number of iterations. Number of iterations for the optimization process.
More iterations can improve results but increase computation time.
Default value is 1000.
umap_n_neighbors
- An integer, the
size of the local neighborhood (in terms of number of neighboring sample
points) used for manifold approximation, controls the balance between
local and global structure in the data, smaller values focus on local
structure, while larger values capture more global structures. Default
value is 15.
umap_min_dist
- A numeric, the
minimum distance between points in the embedded space, controls how
tightly UMAP packs points together, lower values result in a more
clustered embedding. Default value is 0.1
The output of trainHVT function (list of 7 elements) have been explained below with an image attached for clear understanding.
NOTE: Here the attached image is the snapshot of output list generated from map A which can be referred later in this section
Figure 2: The Output list generated by trainHVT function.
The ‘1st element’ is a list containing information related to plotting tessellations. This information might include coordinates, boundaries, or other details necessary for visualizing the tessellations
The ‘2nd element’ is a list containing information related to Sammon’s projection coordinates of the data points in the reduced-dimensional space.
The ‘3rd element’ is a list containing detailed information about the hierarchical vector quantized data along with a summary section containing no of points, Quantization Error and the centroids for each cell for 2D.
The ‘4th element’ is a list that contains all the diagnostics information of the model when diagnose is set to TRUE. Otherwise NA.
The ‘5th element’ is a list that contains all the information required to generates a Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) plot, if hvt_validation is set to TRUE. Otherwise NA
The ‘6th element’ is a list containing detailed information about
the hierarchical vector quantized data along with a summary section
containing no of points, Quantization Error and the centroids for each
cell which is the output of hvq
.
The ‘7th element’ (model info) is a list that contains model generated timestamp, input parameters passed to the model, validation results and the dimensionality reduction evaluation metrics table.
We will use the trainHVT
function to compress our data
while preserving essential features of the dataset. Our goal is to
achieve data compression upto atleast 80%
. In situations
where the compression ratio does not meet the desired target, we can
explore adjusting the model parameters as a potential solution. This
involves making modifications to parameters such as the
quantization error threshold
or
increasing the number of cells
and then rerunning the
trainHVT function again.
As this is already done in HVT Vignette: please refer for more information.
Model Parameters
set.seed(240)
torus_mapA <- trainHVT(
torus_train,
n_cells = 500,
depth = 1,
quant.err = 0.1,
normalize = FALSE,
distance_metric = "L2_Norm",
error_metric = "max",
quant_method = "kmeans",
dim_reduction_method = "sammon"
)
Let’s check the compression summary for torus.
segmentLevel | noOfCells | noOfCellsBelowQuantizationError | percentOfCellsBelowQuantizationErrorThreshold | parameters |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 500 | 448 | 0.9 | n_cells: 500 quant.err: 0.1 distance_metric: L2_Norm error_metric: max quant_method: kmeans |
We successfully compressed 90% of the data using n_cells parameter as 500, the next step involves performing data projection on the compressed data. In this step, the compressed data will be transformed and projected onto a lower-dimensional space to visualize and analyze the data in a more manageable form.
As per the manual, torus_mapA[[3]]
gives us detailed information about the hierarchical vector quantized
data. torus_mapA[[3]][['summary']]
gives a
nice tabular data containing no of points, Quantization Error and the
codebook.
The datatable displayed below is the summary from torus_mapA showing Cell.ID, Centroids and Quantization Error for each of the 500 cells. For the sake of brevity, we are displaying only the first 20 rows.
Segment.Level | Segment.Parent | Segment.Child | n | Cell.ID | Quant.Error | x | y | z |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 133 | 0.0754 | -0.9156 | -0.7427 | 0.5679 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 145 | 0.0634 | -0.2122 | -1.1651 | -0.5760 |
1 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 174 | 0.0406 | -1.0559 | -0.0056 | 0.3274 |
1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 491 | 0.0539 | 2.1556 | 1.8618 | 0.5252 |
1 | 1 | 5 | 18 | 199 | 0.0778 | -1.6661 | 1.5286 | -0.9607 |
1 | 1 | 6 | 18 | 306 | 0.0820 | 1.7298 | -1.1539 | 0.9915 |
1 | 1 | 7 | 24 | 85 | 0.0818 | -2.3941 | 0.6431 | -0.8653 |
1 | 1 | 8 | 15 | 164 | 0.0430 | -0.9748 | -0.2892 | 0.1846 |
1 | 1 | 9 | 16 | 458 | 0.0660 | 1.9507 | 1.3286 | 0.9284 |
1 | 1 | 10 | 22 | 413 | 0.0954 | -0.0517 | 2.6839 | -0.7177 |
1 | 1 | 11 | 11 | 495 | 0.0627 | 1.9150 | 2.1799 | 0.4220 |
1 | 1 | 12 | 13 | 30 | 0.0524 | -1.7647 | -1.7214 | 0.8813 |
1 | 1 | 13 | 10 | 317 | 0.0481 | -0.6928 | 1.8956 | 0.9970 |
1 | 1 | 14 | 23 | 27 | 0.0867 | -2.4987 | -0.8635 | -0.7539 |
1 | 1 | 15 | 17 | 358 | 0.0658 | 1.7985 | -0.4216 | -0.9854 |
1 | 1 | 16 | 16 | 209 | 0.0648 | -1.4374 | 1.2731 | -0.9923 |
1 | 1 | 17 | 10 | 479 | 0.0628 | 1.3518 | 2.5057 | 0.5270 |
1 | 1 | 18 | 12 | 295 | 0.0469 | -0.0451 | 1.0310 | 0.2486 |
1 | 1 | 19 | 33 | 203 | 0.0691 | 0.6004 | -1.2914 | 0.8125 |
1 | 1 | 20 | 16 | 465 | 0.0711 | 2.5842 | 0.6383 | 0.7389 |
Now let us understand what each column in the above table means:
Segment.Level
- Level of the cell.
In this case, we have performed Vector Quantization for depth 1. Hence
Segment Level is 1.
Segment.Parent
- Parent segment of
the cell.
Segment.Child (Cell.Number)
- The
children of a particular cell. In this case, it is the total number of
cells at which we achieved the defined compression percentage.
n
- No of points in each
cell.
Cell.ID
- Cell_ID’s are generated
for the multivariate data using 1-D Sammon’s Projection
algorithm.
Quant.Error
- Quantization Error
for each cell.
All the columns after this will contain centroids for each cell. They can also be called a codebook, which represents a collection of all centroids or codewords.
Now let’s try to understand plotHVT function. The parameters have been explained in detail below:
plotHVT <-(hvt.results,line.width,color.vec,
centroid.size, centroid.color,
child.level, hmap.cols,
cell_id, cell_id_size,
cell_id_position, quant.error.hmap,
separation_width, layer_opacity,
dim_size, plot.type = '2Dhvt')
hvt.results
-
(1D/2Dproj/2Dhvt/2Dheatmap/surface_plot) A list obtained from the
trainHVT function. This list provides an overview of the hierarchical
vector quantized data, including diagnostics, tessellation details,
Sammon’s projection coordinates, and model input information.
line.width
- (2Dhvt/2Dheatmap) A
vector indicating the line widths of the tessellation boundaries for
each layer.
color.vec
- (2Dhvt/2Dheatmap) A
vector indicating the colors of the tessellations boundaries at each
layer.
centroid.size
- (2Dhvt/2Dheatmap) A
vector of size of centroids for each level of tessellations.
centroid.color
- (2Dhvt/2Dheatmap)
A vector of color of centroids for each level of tessellations.
child.level
-
(2Dhvt/2Dheatmap/surface_plot) A Number indicating the level for which
the plot is to be plotted.
hmap.cols
-
(2Dheatmap/surface_plot) A Number or a Character which is the column
number or column name from the dataset indicating the variables for
which the plot should be displayed.
cell_id
- (2Dhvt/2Dheatmap) A
Logical value to indicate whether the plot should have Cell IDs or not.
Only applicable for the level 1. (default = FALSE)
cell_id_size
- (2Dhvt/2Dheatmap) A
number indicating the size of the cell ID text. Only applicable for the
level 1. (default = 1)
cell_id_position
-
(2Dhvt/2Dheatmap) A Character indicating the position of the cell ID
text. Only applicable for the level 1. Accepted entries are ‘top’,
‘left’, ‘bottom’ or ‘right’. (default = ‘bottom’)
quant.error.hmap
- (2Dheatmap) A
number representing the quantization error threshold to be highlighted
in the heatmap. When a value is provided, it will emphasize cells with
quantization errors equal or less than the specified threshold,
indicating that these cells cannot be further subdivided in the next
depth layer. The default value is NULL, meaning all cells will be
colored in the heatmap across various depths.
sepration_width
- (surface_plot) An
integer indicating the width between hierarchical levels in surface
plot.
layer_opacity
- (surface_plot) A
vector indicating the opacity of each hierarchical levels in surface
plot.
dim_size
- (surface_plot) An
integer controls the resolution or granularity of the 3D surface grid.
(Higher dim_size = more detailed/smoother surface but slower rendering
while Lower dim_size = less detailed/blockier surface but faster
rendering)
plot.type
- A Character indicating
which type of plot should be generated. Accepted entries are ‘1D’,
‘2Dproj’,‘2Dhvt’,‘2Dheatmap’ & ‘surface_plot’. Default value is
‘2Dhvt’.
Let’s plot the Voronoi tessellation for layer 1 (map A).
Figure 3: The Voronoi Tessellation for layer 1 (map A) shown for the 500 cells in the dataset ’torus’
Now let’s plot the Voronoi Tessellation with the heatmap overlaid for all the features in the torus dataset for better visualization and interpretation of data patterns and distributions.
The heatmaps displayed below provides a visual representation of the spatial characteristics of the torus dataset, allowing us to observe patterns and trends in the distribution of each of the features (x,y,z). The sheer green shades highlight regions with higher values in each of the heatmaps, while the indigo shades indicate areas with the lowest values in each of the heatmaps. By analyzing these heatmaps, we can gain insights into the variations and relationships between each of these features within the torus dataset.
Figure 4: The Voronoi Tessellation with the heat map overlaid for variable ’x’ in the ’torus’ dataset
Figure 5: The Voronoi Tessellation with the heat map overlaid for variable ’y’ in the ’torus’ dataset
Figure 6: The Voronoi Tessellation with the heat map overlaid for variable ’z’ in the ’torus’ dataset
Let us try to visualize the Map B from the diagram below.
Figure 7: Data Segregation with highlighted bounding box in red around map B
In this section, we will manually figure out the novelty cells from the plotted torus_mapA and store it in identified_Novelty_cells variable.
Note: For manual selecting the novelty cells from
map A, one can enhance its interactivity by adding plotly elements to
the code. This will transform map A into an interactive plot, allowing
users to actively engage with the data. By hovering over the centroids
of the cells, a tag containing segment child
information
will be displayed. Users can explore the map by hovering over different
cells and selectively choose the novelty cells they wish to consider.
Added an image for reference.
Figure 8: Manually selecting novelty cells
The removeNovelty
function removes the
identified novelty cell(s) from the training dataset (containing 9600
datapoints) and stores those records separately.
It takes input as the cell number (Segment.Child) of the manually
identified novelty cell(s) and the compressed HVT map (torus_mapA) with
500 cells. It returns a list of two items:
data with novelty
, and
data without novelty
.
NOTE: As we are using torus dataset
here, the
identified novelty cells given are for demo purpose.
identified_Novelty_cells <<- c(273,44,61,486,185,425) #as a example
output_list <- removeNovelty(identified_Novelty_cells, torus_mapA)
data_with_novelty <- output_list[[1]]
data_without_novelty <- output_list[[2]]
Let’s have a look at the data with novelty(containing 115 records).
novelty_data <- data_with_novelty
novelty_data$Row.No <- row.names(novelty_data)
novelty_data <- novelty_data %>% dplyr::select("Row.No","Cell.ID","Cell.Number","x","y","z")
colnames(novelty_data) <- c("Row.No","Cell.ID","Segment.Child","x","y","z")
displayTable(novelty_data, limit = 115)
Row.No | Cell.ID | Segment.Child | x | y | z |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 424 | 44 | 2.7839 | -1.0776 | -0.1712 |
2 | 424 | 44 | 2.8089 | -1.0384 | 0.1027 |
3 | 424 | 44 | 2.8404 | -0.9040 | 0.1952 |
4 | 424 | 44 | 2.7834 | -1.0866 | 0.1544 |
5 | 424 | 44 | 2.8208 | -0.9473 | 0.2193 |
6 | 424 | 44 | 2.7804 | -1.0582 | -0.2226 |
7 | 424 | 44 | 2.8795 | -0.8408 | 0.0226 |
8 | 424 | 44 | 2.7738 | -1.1262 | -0.1121 |
9 | 424 | 44 | 2.7538 | -1.1860 | -0.0569 |
10 | 424 | 44 | 2.8513 | -0.9218 | -0.0828 |
11 | 424 | 44 | 2.8754 | -0.8550 | 0.0168 |
12 | 424 | 44 | 2.8450 | -0.8996 | 0.1792 |
13 | 424 | 44 | 2.8239 | -0.9397 | 0.2172 |
14 | 424 | 44 | 2.7871 | -1.0527 | -0.2026 |
15 | 424 | 44 | 2.7875 | -1.1082 | -0.0220 |
16 | 424 | 44 | 2.7661 | -1.1507 | 0.0905 |
17 | 34 | 61 | -0.3149 | -2.9384 | 0.2958 |
18 | 34 | 61 | -0.3078 | -2.9675 | 0.1812 |
19 | 34 | 61 | -0.1469 | -2.9921 | 0.0927 |
20 | 34 | 61 | -0.3766 | -2.9762 | 0.0092 |
21 | 34 | 61 | -0.0344 | -2.9993 | 0.0303 |
22 | 34 | 61 | -0.2807 | -2.9525 | 0.2592 |
23 | 34 | 61 | -0.3967 | -2.9725 | 0.0484 |
24 | 34 | 61 | -0.2519 | -2.9034 | 0.4049 |
25 | 34 | 61 | -0.3169 | -2.9822 | 0.0443 |
26 | 34 | 61 | -0.1057 | -2.9757 | 0.2107 |
27 | 34 | 61 | 0.0958 | -2.9784 | 0.1994 |
28 | 34 | 61 | -0.3598 | -2.9046 | 0.3757 |
29 | 34 | 61 | -0.5300 | -2.9485 | 0.0921 |
30 | 34 | 61 | -0.2574 | -2.9769 | 0.1544 |
31 | 34 | 61 | -0.4312 | -2.9677 | 0.0486 |
32 | 34 | 61 | 0.0796 | -2.9885 | 0.1440 |
33 | 34 | 61 | -0.2803 | -2.9049 | 0.3957 |
34 | 34 | 61 | -0.4258 | -2.9397 | 0.2417 |
35 | 34 | 61 | -0.3847 | -2.9574 | 0.1871 |
36 | 34 | 61 | -0.1814 | -2.9475 | 0.3027 |
37 | 34 | 61 | -0.4657 | -2.9341 | 0.2396 |
38 | 34 | 61 | -0.2817 | -2.9829 | 0.0871 |
39 | 34 | 61 | -0.3100 | -2.9449 | 0.2759 |
40 | 34 | 61 | -0.0367 | -2.9262 | 0.3764 |
41 | 34 | 61 | -0.0928 | -2.9950 | 0.0848 |
42 | 75 | 185 | -2.8203 | 0.9904 | -0.1467 |
43 | 75 | 185 | -2.8178 | 1.0260 | 0.0499 |
44 | 75 | 185 | -2.7501 | 1.1484 | -0.1977 |
45 | 75 | 185 | -2.8307 | 0.8870 | -0.2570 |
46 | 75 | 185 | -2.9216 | 0.6631 | -0.0905 |
47 | 75 | 185 | -2.7794 | 1.1095 | -0.1211 |
48 | 75 | 185 | -2.8862 | 0.7563 | -0.1801 |
49 | 75 | 185 | -2.7889 | 1.0811 | -0.1333 |
50 | 75 | 185 | -2.8045 | 1.0304 | 0.1555 |
51 | 75 | 185 | -2.8893 | 0.7432 | -0.1815 |
52 | 75 | 185 | -2.8085 | 1.0402 | -0.1003 |
53 | 75 | 185 | -2.7684 | 1.1089 | -0.1877 |
54 | 75 | 185 | -2.8008 | 1.0713 | -0.0508 |
55 | 75 | 185 | -2.8734 | 0.8593 | -0.0420 |
56 | 75 | 185 | -2.8926 | 0.7896 | 0.0560 |
57 | 75 | 185 | -2.8014 | 1.0351 | 0.1638 |
58 | 75 | 185 | -2.8382 | 0.9661 | -0.0614 |
59 | 75 | 185 | -2.7733 | 1.1066 | -0.1675 |
60 | 75 | 185 | -2.8765 | 0.8519 | -0.0099 |
61 | 75 | 185 | -2.9258 | 0.6607 | -0.0332 |
62 | 75 | 185 | -2.8318 | 0.9591 | 0.1427 |
63 | 439 | 273 | 2.9450 | -0.5316 | 0.1218 |
64 | 439 | 273 | 2.9041 | -0.7280 | 0.1098 |
65 | 439 | 273 | 2.9111 | -0.6332 | 0.2030 |
66 | 439 | 273 | 2.9095 | -0.6207 | 0.2223 |
67 | 439 | 273 | 2.8605 | -0.7913 | 0.2510 |
68 | 439 | 273 | 2.9184 | -0.6856 | -0.0661 |
69 | 439 | 273 | 2.8971 | -0.7568 | 0.1061 |
70 | 439 | 273 | 2.8758 | -0.6541 | 0.3144 |
71 | 439 | 273 | 2.9496 | -0.4882 | 0.1430 |
72 | 439 | 273 | 2.9188 | -0.6454 | 0.1457 |
73 | 439 | 273 | 2.9351 | -0.5220 | 0.1932 |
74 | 439 | 273 | 2.8530 | -0.8358 | 0.2313 |
75 | 439 | 273 | 2.8969 | -0.5663 | 0.3069 |
76 | 439 | 273 | 2.8809 | -0.8085 | 0.1250 |
77 | 439 | 273 | 2.8340 | -0.8588 | 0.2755 |
78 | 460 | 425 | 0.5660 | 2.9195 | 0.2270 |
79 | 460 | 425 | 0.4825 | 2.9331 | -0.2327 |
80 | 460 | 425 | 0.2922 | 2.9667 | 0.1938 |
81 | 460 | 425 | 0.7219 | 2.8642 | 0.3005 |
82 | 460 | 425 | 0.5100 | 2.9548 | 0.0551 |
83 | 460 | 425 | 0.5103 | 2.9319 | 0.2180 |
84 | 460 | 425 | 0.6264 | 2.9337 | -0.0202 |
85 | 460 | 425 | 0.4241 | 2.9696 | -0.0208 |
86 | 460 | 425 | 0.4568 | 2.9565 | -0.1292 |
87 | 460 | 425 | 0.4127 | 2.9640 | 0.1212 |
88 | 460 | 425 | 0.2388 | 2.9833 | 0.1195 |
89 | 460 | 425 | 0.4408 | 2.9674 | 0.0030 |
90 | 460 | 425 | 0.5544 | 2.9221 | 0.2254 |
91 | 460 | 425 | 0.3024 | 2.9847 | 0.0031 |
92 | 460 | 425 | 0.3711 | 2.9462 | 0.2453 |
93 | 460 | 425 | 0.4730 | 2.9532 | 0.1347 |
94 | 19 | 486 | -0.9027 | -2.8262 | 0.2552 |
95 | 19 | 486 | -0.7470 | -2.9053 | 0.0186 |
96 | 19 | 486 | -0.9246 | -2.8381 | 0.1728 |
97 | 19 | 486 | -0.9065 | -2.8593 | 0.0313 |
98 | 19 | 486 | -0.7323 | -2.9085 | -0.0371 |
99 | 19 | 486 | -1.0349 | -2.7844 | 0.2410 |
100 | 19 | 486 | -1.1207 | -2.7825 | 0.0230 |
101 | 19 | 486 | -1.0549 | -2.7973 | 0.1442 |
102 | 19 | 486 | -0.8786 | -2.8665 | -0.0609 |
103 | 19 | 486 | -0.9398 | -2.7706 | 0.3783 |
104 | 19 | 486 | -0.8161 | -2.8680 | 0.1897 |
105 | 19 | 486 | -1.0239 | -2.8185 | -0.0510 |
106 | 19 | 486 | -0.9253 | -2.7881 | 0.3475 |
107 | 19 | 486 | -0.9820 | -2.8178 | 0.1782 |
108 | 19 | 486 | -0.8810 | -2.8624 | 0.1005 |
109 | 19 | 486 | -0.7873 | -2.8533 | 0.2804 |
110 | 19 | 486 | -1.0393 | -2.7889 | 0.2167 |
111 | 19 | 486 | -0.5913 | -2.9309 | 0.1414 |
112 | 19 | 486 | -0.9948 | -2.8299 | 0.0252 |
113 | 19 | 486 | -0.7686 | -2.8947 | -0.1001 |
114 | 19 | 486 | -0.9815 | -2.8025 | 0.2455 |
115 | 19 | 486 | -0.7111 | -2.8678 | 0.2977 |
The plotNovelCells
function is used to
plot the Voronoi tessellation using the compressed HVT map (torus_mapA)
containing 500 cells and highlights the identified novelty cell(s) i.e 6
cells (containing 115 records) in red on the map.
Figure 9: The Voronoi Tessellation constructed using the compressed HVT map (map A) with the novelty cell(s) highlighted in red
We pass the dataframe with novelty records (115 records) to trainHVT function along with other model parameters mentioned below to generate map B (layer2)
Model Parameters
colnames(data_with_novelty) <- c("Cell.ID","Segment.Child","x","y","z")
data_with_novelty <- data_with_novelty[,-1:-2]
mapA_scale_summary = torus_mapA[[3]]$scale_summary
torus_mapB <- trainHVT(data_with_novelty,
n_cells = 11,
depth = 1,
quant.err = 0.1,
normalize = FALSE,
distance_metric = "L2_Norm",
error_metric = "max",
quant_method = "kmeans",
dim_reduction_method = "sammon")
segmentLevel | noOfCells | noOfCellsBelowQuantizationError | percentOfCellsBelowQuantizationErrorThreshold | parameters |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 11 | 10 | 0.91 | n_cells: 11 quant.err: 0.1 distance_metric: L2_Norm error_metric: max quant_method: kmeans |
As it can be seen from the table above,
91%
of the cells have hit the quantization
threshold error. Since we are successfully able to attain the desired
compression percentage, so we will not further subdivide the cells
The datatable displayed below is the summary from map B (layer 2) showing Cell.ID, Centroids and Quantization Error for each of the 11 cells.
Segment.Level | Segment.Parent | Segment.Child | n | Cell.ID | Quant.Error | x | y | z |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0.0497 | -0.0341 | -2.9882 | 0.1270 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 0.0672 | -0.9392 | -2.8448 | -0.0046 |
1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 10 | 0.0970 | 0.4600 | 2.9390 | 0.1984 |
1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 0.0621 | 0.4633 | 2.9571 | -0.0488 |
1 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 8 | 0.0820 | 2.8993 | -0.6751 | 0.1789 |
1 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 9 | 0.1010 | -2.8324 | 0.9469 | -0.0663 |
1 | 1 | 7 | 11 | 5 | 0.0514 | -0.3795 | -2.9641 | 0.1212 |
1 | 1 | 8 | 16 | 7 | 0.0831 | 2.8101 | -1.0120 | 0.0205 |
1 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0.0730 | -0.2520 | -2.9278 | 0.3358 |
1 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0.0481 | -0.9761 | -2.8015 | 0.2422 |
1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 0.0622 | -0.7308 | -2.8890 | 0.1484 |
Let us try to visualize the compressed Map C from the diagram below.
Figure 10:Data Segregation with highlighted bounding box in red around compressed map C
With the Novelties removed, we construct another hierarchical Voronoi tessellation map C layer 2 on the data without Novelty (containing 9485 records) and below mentioned model parameters.
Model Parameters
torus_mapC <- trainHVT(dataset = data_without_novelty,
n_cells = 10,
depth = 2,
quant.err = 0.1,
normalize = FALSE,
distance_metric = "L2_Norm",
error_metric = "max",
quant_method = "kmeans",
dim_reduction_method = "sammon")
Now let’s check the compression summary for HVT (torus_mapC) where n_cell was set to 15. The table below shows no of cells, no of cells having quantization error below threshold and percentage of cells having quantization error below threshold for each level.
segmentLevel | noOfCells | noOfCellsBelowQuantizationError | percentOfCellsBelowQuantizationErrorThreshold | parameters |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | n_cells: 10 quant.err: 0.1 distance_metric: L2_Norm error_metric: max quant_method: kmeans |
2 | 100 | 0 | 0 | n_cells: 10 quant.err: 0.1 distance_metric: L2_Norm error_metric: max quant_method: kmeans |
As it can be seen from the table above,
0%
of the cells have hit the quantization
threshold error in level 1 and 0%
of the
cells have hit the quantization threshold error in level 2
Since, we are yet to achive atleast 80% compression at depth 2. Let’s try to compress again using the below mentioned set of model parameters and the data without novelty (containing 9485 records).
Model Parameters
torus_mapC <- trainHVT(data_without_novelty,
n_cells = 46,
depth = 2,
quant.err = 0.1,
normalize = FALSE,
distance_metric = "L2_Norm",
error_metric = "max",
quant_method = "kmeans",
dim_reduction_method = "sammon")
segmentLevel | noOfCells | noOfCellsBelowQuantizationError | percentOfCellsBelowQuantizationErrorThreshold | parameters |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 46 | 0 | 0 | n_cells: 46 quant.err: 0.1 distance_metric: L2_Norm error_metric: max quant_method: kmeans |
2 | 2116 | 1748 | 0.83 | n_cells: 46 quant.err: 0.1 distance_metric: L2_Norm error_metric: max quant_method: kmeans |
As it can be seen from the table above,
0%
of the cells have hit the quantization
threshold error in level 1 and 83%
of the
cells have hit the quantization threshold error in level 2.
The datatable displayed below is the summary from map C (layer2). showing Cell.ID, Centroids and Quantization Error.
Segment.Level | Segment.Parent | Segment.Child | n | Cell.ID | Quant.Error | x | y | z |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 183 | 567 | 0.3054 | -1.5739 | 2.3989 | -0.0019 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 236 | 355 | 0.3085 | -1.5176 | -1.2760 | -0.9229 |
1 | 1 | 3 | 162 | 88 | 0.2925 | -1.7876 | -2.2656 | 0.0079 |
1 | 1 | 4 | 167 | 1865 | 0.2886 | 2.5078 | -1.4110 | -0.1993 |
1 | 1 | 5 | 183 | 874 | 0.3030 | 0.4550 | -2.6700 | -0.5138 |
1 | 1 | 6 | 251 | 1120 | 0.2282 | -0.1585 | 1.0003 | -0.0305 |
1 | 1 | 7 | 194 | 1576 | 0.2510 | 1.3877 | -0.0061 | 0.7561 |
1 | 1 | 8 | 196 | 1208 | 0.3194 | -0.4306 | 2.5131 | -0.7020 |
1 | 1 | 9 | 189 | 2042 | 0.2972 | 1.7211 | 2.2262 | 0.3548 |
1 | 1 | 10 | 273 | 609 | 0.2847 | -1.1913 | -0.1942 | 0.6043 |
1 | 1 | 11 | 248 | 1320 | 0.2812 | 0.2437 | 1.4647 | 0.8136 |
1 | 1 | 12 | 257 | 1537 | 0.2358 | 1.2573 | 0.0921 | -0.6336 |
1 | 1 | 13 | 187 | 602 | 0.3037 | -0.1334 | -2.4336 | 0.7936 |
1 | 1 | 14 | 207 | 331 | 0.3187 | -2.2996 | 1.3756 | -0.5613 |
1 | 1 | 15 | 154 | 2118 | 0.2917 | 2.6593 | 1.1769 | 0.0397 |
1 | 1 | 16 | 288 | 1465 | 0.2804 | 0.5899 | 1.2696 | -0.7664 |
1 | 1 | 17 | 148 | 2003 | 0.2886 | 2.7567 | -0.1572 | 0.4931 |
1 | 1 | 18 | 269 | 886 | 0.2929 | -0.9237 | 1.3992 | -0.8903 |
1 | 1 | 19 | 170 | 153 | 0.3206 | -2.5259 | -0.5698 | -0.7073 |
1 | 1 | 20 | 243 | 1251 | 0.2330 | 0.8259 | -0.6708 | 0.3379 |
Let’s plot the Voronoi tessellation for layer 2 (map C)
plotHVT(torus_mapC,
line.width = c(0.2,0.1),
color.vec = c("navyblue","steelblue"),
centroid.size = 0.1,
child.level = 2,
plot.type = '2Dhvt')
Figure 11: The Voronoi Tessellation for layer 2 (map C) shown for the 928 cells in the dataset ’torus’ at level 2
Now let’s plot all the features for each cell at level two as a heatmap for better visualization.
The heatmaps displayed below provides a visual representation of the spatial characteristics of the torus dataset, allowing us to observe patterns and trends in the distribution of each of the features (x,y,z). The sheer green shades highlight regions with higher values in each of the heatmaps, while the indigo shades indicate areas with the lowest values in each of the heatmaps. By analyzing these heatmaps, we can gain insights into the variations and relationships between each of these features within the torus dataset.
plotHVT(
torus_mapC,
child.level = 2,
hmap.cols = "x",
line.width = c(0.2,0.1),
color.vec = c("navyblue","steelblue"),
centroid.size = 0.1,
plot.type = '2Dheatmap')
Figure 12: The Voronoi Tessellation with the heat map overlaid for
feature x
in the ’torus’ dataset
plotHVT(
torus_mapC,
child.level = 2,
hmap.cols = "y",
line.width = c(0.2,0.1),
color.vec = c("navyblue","steelblue"),
centroid.size = 0.1,
plot.type = '2Dheatmap')
Figure 13: The Voronoi Tessellation with the heat map overlaid for
feature y
in the ’torus’ dataset
plotHVT(
torus_mapC,
child.level = 2,
hmap.cols = "z",
line.width = c(0.2,0.1),
color.vec = c("navyblue","steelblue"),
centroid.size = 0.1,
plot.type = '2Dheatmap')
Figure 14: The Voronoi Tessellation with the heat map overlaid for
feature z
in the ’torus’ dataset
We now have the set of maps (map A, map B & map C) which will be used to score, which map and cell each test record is assigned to.
Now once we have built the model, let us try to score using our testing dataset (containing 2400 data points) which cell and which layer each point belongs to.
The scoreLayeredHVT function is used to score the testing dataset using the scored set of maps. This function takes an input - a testing dataset and a set of maps (map A, map B, map C).
Now, Let us understand the
scoreLayeredHVT
function.
scoreLayeredHVT(data,
hvt_mapA,
hvt_mapB,
hvt_mapC,
child.level = 1,
mad.threshold = 0.2,
normalize = TRUE,
distance_metric="L1_Norm",
error_metric="max",
yVar)
Each of the parameters of scoreLayeredHVT function has been explained below:
Before that, the approach of scoreLayeredHVT
function is
to use scoreHVT function to score the test data against the given
results of trainHVT which is referred as ‘map’ here. Hence the
scoreLayeredHVT scores the test dataset against map A, B & C and
further process and merge the final output. So the arguments used in
scoreHVT is important here for smooth execution of function.
data
- A dataframe containing the
test dataset. The dataframe should have all the variable(features) used
for training.
hvt_mapA
- Result obtained from
trainHVT function while performing hierarchical vector quantization on
train data. This list containes information about the hierarchical
vector quantized data along with a summary section.
hvt_mapB
- Result obtained from
trainHVT function while performing hierarchical vector quantization on
data with novelty data.It is a subset of the training data obtained as a
result of removeNovelty function (1st element).
hvt_mapC
- Result obtained from
trainHVT function while performing hierarchical vector quantization on
data without novelty. It is a subset of the training data obtained as a
result of removeNovelty function (2nd element).
child.level
- A number indicating
the depth for which the heat map is to be plotted. Each depth represents
a different level of clustering or partitioning of the data.
mad.threshold
- A numeric value
indicating the permissible Mean Absolute Deviation which is obtained
from Minimum Intra centroid plot(when diagnose is set to TRUE in
trainHVT). mad.threshold
value is important since it is
used in anomaly detection. Default value is 0.2 NOTE: for a given
datapoint, when the quantization error is above
mad.threshold
it is denoted as anomaly else
not.
normalize
- A logical value
indicating if the dataset should be normalized. When set to TRUE, the
data (testing dataset) is standardized by mean and sd of the training
dataset referred from the trainHVT(). When set to FALSE, the
data
is used as such without any changes.
distance_metric
- The distance
metric can be L1_Norm
(Manhattan) or
L2_Norm
(Euclidean). The metric is used when calculating
distance between each datapoint(in test dataset) with the centroids
obtained from results of trainHVT. Default is
L1_Norm
.
error_metric
- The error metric can
be mean
or max
. max
will return
the max of m
values and mean
will take mean of
m
values where each value is a distance between the
datapoint and centroid of the cell. This helps in calculating the scored
quantization error. Default value is max
.
yVar
- A character or a vector
representing the name of the dependent variable(s)
When normalize is set to TRUE, the scoreHVT function has an inbuilt feature to standardize the testing dataset based on the mean and standard deviation of the training dataset from the trainHVT results.
scoreLayeredHVT
function the testing dataset is
scored against all the maps (A, B & C) by using scoreHVT function
and the results are merged and further processed.The function score based on the HVT maps - map A, map B and map C, constructed using trainHVT function. For each test record, the function will assign that record to Layer1 or Layer2. Layer1 contains the cell ids from map A and Layer 2 contains cell ids from map B (novelty map) and map C (map without novelty).
Scoring Algorithm
The Scoring algorithm recursively calculates the distance between each point in the testing dataset and the cell centroids for each level. The following steps explain the scoring method for a single point in the test dataset:
Note : The Scoring algorithm will not work if some of the variables used to perform quantization are missing. In the testing dataset, we should not remove any features.
validation_data <- torus_test
new_score <- scoreLayeredHVT(
data=validation_data,
hvt_mapA = torus_mapA,
hvt_mapB = torus_mapB,
hvt_mapC = torus_mapC,
normalize = FALSE )
Let’s see which cell and layer each point belongs to and check the Mean Absolute Difference for each of the 2400 records.
Row_Number | Row.Number | act_x | act_y | act_z | Layer1.Cell.ID | Layer2.Cell.ID | pred_x | pred_y | pred_z | diff |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | -2.6282 | 0.5656 | -0.7253 | A85 | C153 | -2.5258976 | -0.5697529 | -0.7072982 | 0.4185524 |
2 | 2 | 2.7471 | -0.9987 | -0.3848 | A425 | C1865 | 2.5077850 | -1.4109928 | -0.1993299 | 0.2790259 |
3 | 3 | -2.4446 | -1.6528 | 0.3097 | A3 | C64 | -2.4619927 | -1.3983722 | 0.3219391 | 0.0946865 |
4 | 4 | -2.6487 | -0.5745 | 0.7040 | A41 | C287 | -2.0844505 | -0.4682857 | 0.9330797 | 0.2998478 |
5 | 5 | -0.2676 | -1.0800 | -0.4611 | A157 | C815 | -0.1826176 | -1.4024576 | -0.7633130 | 0.2365510 |
6 | 6 | -1.1130 | -0.6516 | -0.7040 | A126 | C695 | -0.8306652 | -0.6299318 | -0.2497557 | 0.2527491 |
7 | 7 | 2.0288 | 1.9519 | 0.5790 | A491 | C2042 | 1.7210566 | 2.2261741 | 0.3547593 | 0.2687527 |
8 | 8 | -2.4799 | 1.6863 | -0.0470 | A140 | C331 | -2.2995517 | 1.3755594 | -0.5613184 | 0.3351357 |
9 | 9 | -0.4105 | -1.1610 | -0.6398 | A119 | C815 | -0.1826176 | -1.4024576 | -0.7633130 | 0.1976176 |
10 | 10 | -0.2545 | -1.6160 | -0.9314 | A83 | C815 | -0.1826176 | -1.4024576 | -0.7633130 | 0.1511706 |
11 | 11 | 1.1500 | 0.3945 | -0.6205 | A352 | C1537 | 1.2572988 | 0.0921132 | -0.6335630 | 0.1409162 |
12 | 12 | -1.2557 | -1.1369 | 0.9520 | A67 | C436 | -1.1822271 | -1.5123679 | 0.9261489 | 0.1582640 |
13 | 13 | -0.5449 | -2.6892 | -0.6684 | A43 | C352 | -0.8252530 | -2.4340675 | -0.7088662 | 0.1919839 |
14 | 14 | 2.9093 | 0.7222 | -0.0697 | A478 | C2118 | 2.6593221 | 1.1768851 | 0.0397240 | 0.2713623 |
15 | 15 | 2.3205 | 1.2520 | -0.7711 | A476 | C1908 | 1.8601725 | 1.2505847 | -0.8798926 | 0.1901785 |
16 | 16 | 1.4772 | -0.5194 | -0.9008 | A298 | C1646 | 1.8050471 | -0.8284412 | -0.9447865 | 0.2269582 |
17 | 17 | -1.3176 | -2.6541 | 0.2690 | A11 | C88 | -1.7876407 | -2.2655926 | 0.0079136 | 0.3732115 |
18 | 18 | 1.0687 | 0.1211 | -0.3812 | A316 | C1537 | 1.2572988 | 0.0921132 | -0.6335630 | 0.1566495 |
19 | 19 | -0.9632 | 0.3283 | -0.1866 | A195 | C807 | -0.9247605 | 0.4324310 | -0.1556399 | 0.0578435 |
20 | 20 | 2.5616 | 0.4634 | 0.7976 | A465 | C1891 | 2.1489362 | 0.5766913 | 0.9229370 | 0.2170973 |
hist(new_score[["actual_predictedTable"]]$diff,
breaks = 30, col = "blue", main = "Mean Absolute Difference",
xlab = "Difference")
Figure 16: Mean Absolute Difference
We have considered torus dataset for creating a scored sequence of maps using scoreLayeredHVT() in this vignette.
Our goal is to achieve data compression upto atleast
80%
.
We construct a compressed HVT map (torus_mapA) using the
trainHVT() on the training dataset by setting
n_cells
to 500 and
quant.error
to 0.1 and we were able to
attain a compression of 90%.
Based on the output of the above step, we manually identify the novelty cell(s) from the plotted map A. For this dataset, we identify the 6 cells as the novelty cells. (since torus dataset does not have outliers we are using this for demo purpose.)
We pass the identified novelty cell(s) as a parameter to the removeNovelty() along with HVT torus_mapA. The function removes that novelty cell(s) from the dataset and stores them separately. It also returns the data without novelty(s).
The plotNovelCells() constructs hierarchical voronoi tessellations and highlights the identified novelty cell(s) in red.
The data with novelty is then passed to the trainHVT() to
construct another HVT map (torus_mapB). But here, we set the parameters
n_cells
= 10,
depth
= 2 etc. when constructing the
map.
The data without novelty is then passed to the trainHVT() to
construct another HVT map (torus_mapC). But here, we set the parameters
n_cells
= 46,
depth
= 2 etc. when constructing the
map.
Finally, the set of maps - torus_mapA,torus_mapB,torus_mapC are passed to the scoreLayeredHVT() along with the test dataset to score which map and what cell each test record is assigned to.
The output of scoreLayeredHVT is a dataset with two columns Layer1.Cell.ID and Layer2.Cell.ID. Layer1.Cell.ID contains cell ids from map A in the form A1,A2,A3…. and Layer2.Cell.ID contains cell ids from map B as B1,B2… depending on the identified novelties and map C as C1,C2,C3…..