Last updated: 2023-06-06
Checks: 1 1
Knit directory: DEanalysis/
This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.7.0). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.
The R Markdown is untracked by Git. To know which version of the R Markdown file created these results, you’ll want to first commit it to the Git repo. If you’re still working on the analysis, you can ignore this warning. When you’re finished, you can run wflow_publish
to commit the R Markdown file and build the HTML.
Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility.
The results in this page were generated with repository version 3b1c8ca. See the Past versions tab to see a history of the changes made to the R Markdown and HTML files.
Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish
or wflow_git_commit
). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:
Untracked files:
Untracked: .DS_Store
Untracked: analysis/.DS_Store
Untracked: analysis/.Rhistory
Untracked: analysis/data_clusters.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/group12_13.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/group2_19.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/group8_17&2_19.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/methods_details.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/new_criteria.Rmd
Untracked: data/10X_inputdata.RData
Untracked: data/10X_inputdata_DEresult.RData
Untracked: data/10X_inputdata_cpm.RData
Untracked: data/10X_inputdata_integrated.RData
Untracked: data/10X_inputdata_lognorm.RData
Unstaged changes:
Modified: analysis/index.Rmd
Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.
These are the previous versions of the repository in which changes were made to the R Markdown (analysis/methods_details.Rmd
) and HTML (docs/methods_details.html
) files. If you’ve configured a remote Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote
), click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view the files as they were in that past version.
File | Version | Author | Date | Message |
---|---|---|---|---|
html | 2107af3 | C-HW | 2023-05-24 | add methods_details |
In this project, we compare a few methods performing the DE analysis results. Each of them might use different input data ,different statistical model and different FDR control on p-values.
Only genes that pass the threshold for gene expression frequency will be considered as inputs.
For each gene, we run a poisson glmm method (glmmPQL) on the raw counts with cellgroups as fixed effect and repgroups as random effect Xcgk|λcgk∼Poisson(λcgk)logλcgk=μg+Xcβg+ϵgk
If the algorithm doesn’t converge, the gene will be excluded.
Only genes that pass the threshold for gene expression frequency will be considered as inputs.
We take the zero proportion of each gene as the response in the binomial model. (1 if the read count is zero; otherwise 0.)
For each gene, we run a binomial glmm method (glmmPQL) on the zero proportion with cellgroups as fixed effect and repgroups as random effect 1Xcgk=0|pcgk∼Bernoulli(pcgk)logpcgk1−pcgk=μg+Xcβg+ϵgk
If the algorithm doesn’t converge, the gene will be excluded.
Only genes that pass the threshold for gene expression frequency will be considered as inputs.
For each gene, we run a poisson glm method (stats::glm) on the raw counts with cellgroups as fixed effect (adding repgroups if with donor effect) Xcgk|λcgk∼Poisson(λcgk)logλcgk=μg+Xcβg
If the algorithm doesn’t converge, the gene will be excluded.