When AI writing feedback quotes a student's sentence back to them, did it copy the student's words exactly, or quietly fix them? Paste the student's text and the feedback; every quoted passage in the feedback is checked against the student's text. Nothing leaves this page: it works offline and makes no network requests.
What the verdicts mean
Exactthe quote appears character for character in the student's text.
Same wordsevery word matches, in order; only punctuation, spacing or capital letters differ.
Same words, some left outMarkdown-aware mode only: the quote uses an ellipsis (...) to leave words out, and every piece is the student's words, in order.
Changed words, markedMarkdown-aware mode only: words were changed, and the quote shows bold or italics, which usually marks a correction the reader is meant to see.
Changed wordsthe quote is close to a passage of the student's text, but words were added, dropped or changed (for example a misspelling silently corrected). The passage the student actually wrote is shown next to it.
Not foundno passage of the student's text is close enough (word similarity below the threshold).
Similarity is the word-level match ratio (0 to 1) between the quote and the closest passage, the same measure Python's difflib uses. Single quotation marks are not treated as quote marks, because they double as apostrophes; use "one quote per line" for those. This is a mechanical check of copying, not a judgement of the feedback's quality.
Why Markdown-aware: in MV2's audit of 50,742 quotes in published AI feedback on IELTS essays, only 37.7% were character-exact, but 95.7% kept the student's words once formatting and ellipses were set aside. Changed words were most common in short quotes of 4 to 6 words, and some of those are suggested phrasing rather than the student's words, so read short changed quotes first.