Last updated: 2020-11-30

Checks: 2 0

Knit directory: fa_sim_cal/

This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.6.2). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.

R Markdown file: up-to-date

Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.

Repository version: 680e328

Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility.

The results in this page were generated with repository version 680e328. See the Past versions tab to see a history of the changes made to the R Markdown and HTML files.

Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish or wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated: 


Ignored files:
    Ignored:    .Rhistory
    Ignored:    .Rproj.user/
    Ignored:    .tresorit/
    Ignored:    renv/library/

Untracked files:
    Untracked:  CITATION
    Untracked:  LICENSE.md

Unstaged changes:
    Modified:   README.md
    Modified:   data/README.md
    Modified:   manuscripts/README.md
    Modified:   output/README.md

Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.

These are the previous versions of the repository in which changes were made to the R Markdown (analysis/idea.Rmd) and HTML (docs/idea.html) files. If you’ve configured a remote Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote), click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view the files as they were in that past version.

File Version Author Date Message
html c2e37f3 Ross Gayler 2020-11-30 Initial ndex.Rmd
Rmd 2a722d0 Ross Gayler 2020-11-29 end of day
html 2a722d0 Ross Gayler 2020-11-29 end of day

This document explains the central idea behind the project.

Problem setting

Probability of identity

Similarity

Calibrated similarity

Subpopulation calibration

Combining calibrated similarity

A test citation: (Lange and Naumann 2011)

References

Lange, Dustin, and Felix Naumann. 2011. “Frequency-Aware Similarity Measures: Why Arnold Schwarzenegger Is Always a Duplicate.” In, 243–48. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2063576.2063616.