This report covers the planned outcomes for MIECHV 3.
Instructions: Discuss the (a) usefulness, (b) feasibility, and (c) definitions of these proposed measures. These ‘common’ measures will be derived from ETO and made available to providers weekly; no extra effort should be required. HV CoIIN recommends that every site beginning to use these measures for the first time conduct a diagnostic analysis of their family engagement processes by reviewing all of these measures using 1-2 months of historical data (for example, look back at data from 3 months ago and 4 months ago).
% of families that received all of the expected home visits this month
% total capacity served
% of available capacity that was filled this month
Ratio of suitable referrals to available service capacity
% of families contacted, among those attempted to contact
% of referrals that were appropriate
% of referred families contacted who received any contact within 48 hours
% of referred families contacted who received a face-to-face contact within 7 days
Average N of days from referral to 1st face-to-face contact
% of families (with a completed referral) that enrolled in home visiting services
Among families enrolled, Average N of days between receipt of referral and enrollment
% of families without a 21+ day drought between visits
% of families on alternate visit schedule
% of families completing 3+ months
% of families completing 6+ months
% of families completing 12+ months
% of families completing 18+ months
% of families that disenrolled from the program for ‘addressable’ reasons
% of families ask about child development
% of visits considered ‘succcessful’
| id |
title (driver) |
description | equation | note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
visits all (SMART Aim) |
% of families that received all of the expected home visits this month |
numerator: N of enrolled families that received all of the expected home visits this month denominator: N enrolled families not on creative outreach, alternate visit schedule or level X. (Where ‘enrolled’ is defined as a completed visit in past 90 days.) |
– |
| 2 |
capacity served (3) |
% total capacity served |
numerator: Current caseload denominator: Expected service capacity |
– |
| 3 |
capacity filled (3) |
% of available capacity that was filled this month |
numerator: N of families newly enrolled this month denominator: Available service capacity at beginning of month |
– |
| 4 |
referral suitability (3) |
Ratio of suitable referrals to available service capacity |
numerator: N of referrals received this month denominator: available service capacity |
– |
| 5 |
referral contacted (3) |
% of families contacted, among those attempted to contact |
numerator: N of families referred this month that were contacted denominator: N of families referred this month that attempted to contact |
– |
| 6 |
referral appropri- ateness (3) |
% of referrals that were appropriate |
numerator: N of referrals this month that were appropriate denominator: N of families referred this month that were contacted |
– |
| 7a |
contact any (3) |
% of referred families contacted who received any contact within 48 hours |
numerator: N of families contacted that received any contact within 48 hours denominator: N of families referred this month that were contacted |
– |
| 7b |
contact face (3) |
% of referred families contacted who received a face-to-face contact within 7 days |
numerator: N of families contacted that received a first face-to-face contact within 7 days denominator: N of families referred this month that were contacted |
– |
| 8 |
contact lag (3) |
Average N of days from referral to 1st face-to-face contact |
numerator: N of families referred this month that were contacted and offered home visiting services denominator: N of families referred this month that were contacted |
– |
| 10 |
enroll conversion (3) |
% of families (with a completed referral) that enrolled in home visiting services |
numerator: N of families referred this month that had a completed visit within 90 days denominator: N of families referred this month with a completed referral |
– |
| 11 |
enroll lag (3) |
Among families enrolled, Average N of days between receipt of referral and enrollment | Since there could be different valid definitions of “referral date”, this may need to be measures #11a, #11b, #11c … | Possibly using date when client is: (a) entered into the system, (b) assigned to program, (c) assigned to provider, … |
| 12 |
visit drought (4) |
% of families without a 21+ day drought between visits |
numerator: Among families for whom weekly or biweekly visits are expected, N without 21+ days between visits denominator: N of families for whom weekly or biweekly visits are expected |
– |
| 13 |
visit schedule alternate (4) |
% of families on alternate visit schedule |
numerator: N of families designated to get a number of home visits different from the number recommended by the model’s typical visit schedule - including families on alternate visit schedule, inactive, etc. denominator: N of enrolled families |
– |
| 14a |
retention month 03 (5) |
% of families completing 3+ months |
numerator: N of families who completed 3+ months of visits denominator: N of families whose 1st HV was 3 to 6 months ago |
– |
| 14b |
retention month 06 (5) |
% of families completing 6+ months |
numerator: N of families who completed 6+ months of visits denominator: N of families whose 1st HV was 6 to 12 months ago |
– |
| 14c |
retention month 12 (5) |
% of families completing 12+ months |
numerator: N of families whose 1st HV was 12+ months of visits denominator: N of families whose 1st HV was 12 to 18 months ago |
– |
| 14d |
retention month 18 (5) |
% of families completing 18+ months |
numerator: N of families whose 1st HV was 18+ months of visits denominator: N of families whose 1st HV was 18 to 24 months ago |
– |
| 17 |
disenrolled addressable (5) |
% of families that disenrolled from the program for ‘addressable’ reasons |
numerator: N of families who disenrolled for ‘addressable’ reasons denominator: N of families who disenrolled from the home visiting program |
Help us define “addressable” along the lines of ‘legitimate’ or ‘valid’ or ‘justified’ |
| 18 |
inquire development (?) |
% of families ask about child development |
numerator: N of visits that provider asked if parent has concerns about the development of child. denominator: N of visits w/ child 0+ days old |
ETO item needs a third option “did not ask parent” (visit touchpoint) |
| id |
title (driver) |
description | equation | note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 |
visit successful (5) |
% of visits considered ‘succcessful’ | – | ?How should this be defined? |
For the sake of documentation and reproducibility, the current report was rendered in the following environment. Click the line below to expand.
Environment
Session info -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- setting value
version R version 3.4.1 (2017-06-30)
system x86_64, linux-gnu
ui X11
language en_US
collate en_US.UTF-8
tz America/Chicago
date 2017-07-20 Packages ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ package * version date source
assertthat 0.2.0 2017-04-11 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
backports 1.1.0 2017-05-22 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
base * 3.4.1 2017-07-08 local
bindr 0.1 2016-11-13 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
bindrcpp * 0.2 2017-06-17 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
brew 1.0-6 2011-04-13 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
checkmate 1.8.3 2017-07-03 Github (mllg/checkmate@43241ee)
collapsibleTree 0.1.4 2017-03-22 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
colorspace 1.3-2 2016-12-14 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
compiler 3.4.1 2017-07-08 local
data.tree 0.7.0 2017-01-06 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
datasets * 3.4.1 2017-07-08 local
devtools 1.13.2 2017-06-02 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
DiagrammeR 0.9.0 2017-01-04 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
digest 0.6.12 2017-01-27 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
dplyr 0.7.1 2017-06-22 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
evaluate 0.10.1 2017-06-24 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
ggplot2 2.2.1.9000 2017-07-11 Github (hadley/ggplot2@4255cd8)
glue * 1.1.1 2017-06-21 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
graphics * 3.4.1 2017-07-08 local
grDevices * 3.4.1 2017-07-08 local
grid 3.4.1 2017-07-08 local
gridExtra 2.2.1 2016-02-29 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
gtable 0.2.0 2016-02-26 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
highr 0.6 2016-05-09 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
hms 0.3 2016-11-22 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
htmltools 0.3.6 2017-04-28 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
htmlwidgets 0.9 2017-07-11 Github (ramnathv/htmlwidgets@6f4101d)
httr 1.2.1 2016-07-03 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
igraph 1.0.1 2015-06-26 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
influenceR 0.1.0 2015-09-03 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
jsonlite 1.5 2017-06-01 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
kableExtra 0.3.0 2017-07-04 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
knitr * 1.16 2017-05-18 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
lazyeval 0.2.0 2016-06-12 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
magrittr * 1.5 2014-11-22 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
memoise 1.1.0 2017-04-21 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
methods * 3.4.1 2017-07-08 local
munsell 0.4.3 2016-02-13 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
OuhscMunge 0.1.8.9002 2017-07-02 local
pkgconfig 2.0.1 2017-03-21 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
plyr 1.8.4 2016-06-08 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
purrr 0.2.2.2 2017-05-11 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
R6 2.2.2 2017-06-17 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
RColorBrewer 1.1-2 2014-12-07 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
Rcpp 0.12.11 2017-05-22 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
readr 1.1.1 2017-05-16 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
rgexf 0.15.3 2015-03-24 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
rlang 0.1.1.9000 2017-07-02 Github (hadley/rlang@ff87439)
rmarkdown 1.6 2017-06-15 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
Rook 1.1-1 2014-10-20 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
rprojroot 1.2 2017-01-16 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
rstudioapi 0.6 2016-06-27 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
rvest 0.3.2 2016-06-17 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
scales 0.4.1.9002 2017-07-11 Github (hadley/scales@6db7b6f)
stats * 3.4.1 2017-07-08 local
stringi 1.1.5 2017-04-07 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
stringr 1.2.0 2017-02-18 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
tibble 1.3.3 2017-06-01 Github (tidyverse/tibble@b2275d5)
tidyr 0.6.3 2017-05-15 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
tools 3.4.1 2017-07-08 local
utils * 3.4.1 2017-07-08 local
viridis 0.4.0 2017-03-27 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
viridisLite 0.2.0 2017-03-24 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
visNetwork 2.0.0 2017-06-26 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
withr 1.0.2 2016-06-20 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
XML 3.98-1.9 2017-06-19 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
xml2 1.1.1 2017-01-24 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
yaml 2.1.14 2016-11-12 CRAN (R 3.4.1) Report rendered by wibeasley at 2017-07-20, 12:26 -0500 in 3 seconds.