Last updated: 2022-05-10

Checks: 1 1

Knit directory: apocrine_signature_mdamb453/

This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.7.0). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.

R Markdown file: uncommitted changes

The R Markdown file has unstaged changes. To know which version of the R Markdown file created these results, you’ll want to first commit it to the Git repo. If you’re still working on the analysis, you can ignore this warning. When you’re finished, you can run wflow_publish to commit the R Markdown file and build the HTML.

Repository version: 8797971

Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility.

The results in this page were generated with repository version 8797971. See the Past versions tab to see a history of the changes made to the R Markdown and HTML files.

Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish or wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated: 


Ignored files:
    Ignored:    .Rhistory
    Ignored:    .Rproj.user/
    Ignored:    data/bigwig/

Untracked files:
    Untracked:  data/peaks/

Unstaged changes:
    Modified:   .gitignore
    Modified:   analysis/_site.yml
    Deleted:    analysis/about.Rmd
    Modified:   analysis/index.Rmd
    Deleted:    analysis/license.Rmd
    Deleted:    data/README.md

Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.

These are the previous versions of the repository in which changes were made to the R Markdown (analysis/index.Rmd) and HTML (docs/index.html) files. If you’ve configured a remote Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote), click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view the files as they were in that past version.

File Version Author Date Message
Rmd 8797971 Steve Pederson 2022-04-27 Start workflowr project.

Introduction

This analysis compares the binding sites of AR, FOXA1, GATA3 and TFAP2B in MDA-MB-453 cells. All ChIP targets were obtained from separate experiments using Vehicle as the reference condition and DHT-treatment as the key response under investigation. Given the mostly cytoplasmic location of AR in Vehicle, the primary comparison will be performed using DHT-treated samples. For all targets, the cistrome is largely conserved across conditions. Analysis using the GRAVI workflow is available here (for those given access)