Last updated: 2018-10-31

workflowr checks: (Click a bullet for more information)

• ✔ R Markdown file: up-to-date

  Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.

• ✔ Repository version: 4d17ca9

  Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility. The version displayed above was the version of the Git repository at the time these results were generated.
  
  Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish or wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:

  
  Ignored files:
      Ignored:    .DS_Store
      Ignored:    .Rhistory
      Ignored:    .Rproj.user/
      Ignored:    analysis/.DS_Store
      Ignored:    analysis/data/
      Ignored:    analysis/package.Rmd
      Ignored:    assets/
      Ignored:    docs/.DS_Store
  
  Untracked files:
      Untracked:  docs/assets/Boettiger-2018-Ecology_Letters.pdf
      Untracked:  docs/assets/Packaging-Data-Analytical Work-Reproducibly-Using-R-and-Friends.pdf
      Untracked:  docs/css/
      Untracked:  libs/
  
  Unstaged changes:
      Modified:   analysis/_site.yml
      Modified:   analysis/index.Rmd
  
  

  Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.

Expand here to see past versions:

File	Version	Author	Date	Message
html	c26c936	annakrystalli	2018-10-31	Build site.
html	52adf4f	annakrystalli	2018-10-30	Build site.
html	921a7f8	annakrystalli	2018-10-30	commit docs
Rmd	572d00b	annakrystalli	2018-10-15	Start workflowr project.

---

What license are you using for your code? See choosealicense.com for help deciding. It’s a convention to save a file LICENSE in the root of your Git repo that contains the license text.

What license are you using for the written content on your site? It is traditional to choose a Creative Commons license for this type of content.

How should others cite your work? It’s a convention to save a file CITATION in the root of your Git repo that contains the citation information.

---

This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr 1.1.1

---