Last updated: 2020-06-03

Checks: 2 0

Knit directory: covid19-suicide-lsr.github.io2/

This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.6.2). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.

Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.

Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility.

The results in this page were generated with repository version 963ee67. See the Past versions tab to see a history of the changes made to the R Markdown and HTML files.

Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish or wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:


working directory clean


Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.

These are the previous versions of the repository in which changes were made to the R Markdown (analysis/index.Rmd) and HTML (index.html) files. If you’ve configured a remote Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote), click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view the files as they were in that past version.

File Version Author Date Message
html f810976 L-ENA 2020-06-03 Build site.
Rmd 2524b68 L-ENA 2020-06-03 Publications visual update
html a7e0ad3 L-ENA 2020-06-03 Build site.
Rmd 376223e L-ENA 2020-06-03 Publications visual update
html a63b1eb L-ENA 2020-06-03 Build site.
html 5545c44 L-ENA 2020-06-03 Build site.
html 9482d31 L-ENA 2020-06-03 Build site.
html 209c106 L-ENA 2020-06-03 Build site.
Rmd 917bb68 L-ENA 2020-06-03 Experimental customisation
html 02e01b4 Luke McGuinness 2020-06-02 Customising to our review
html 7ab0d3c Luke McGuinness 2020-06-02 Fix conflict
Rmd fb2ab91 Luke McGuinness 2020-06-02 Still customising
html fb2ab91 Luke McGuinness 2020-06-02 Still customising
Rmd fa2a72f Luke McGuinness 2020-06-02 Customising to our review
html fa2a72f Luke McGuinness 2020-06-02 Customising to our review
Rmd b66043b Luke McGuinness 2020-06-02 Inital commit
html b66043b Luke McGuinness 2020-06-02 Inital commit

# The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: a living systematic review

### Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused widespread morbidity and mortality as well as disruption to people’s lives and livelihoods around the world; this has occurred as a result of both infection with the virus itself and the health protection measures taken to curb its spread. There are concerns that rates of suicide, suicidal behaviours and self-harm may rise during and in the aftermath of the pandemic. Given the likely rapidly expanding research evidence base on the pandemic’s impact on rates of suicide, suicidal behaviours and self-harm and emerging evidence about how best to mitigate such effects, it is important that the best available knowledge is made readily available to policymakers, public health specialists and clinicians as soon as is possible. To facilitate this, we plan to undertake a living systematic review focusing on suicide prevention in relation to COVID-19.

Regular automated searches will feed into a web-based screening system which will also host the data extraction form for included articles. Our eligibility criteria are wide and include aspects of incidence and prevalence of suicidal behaviour, effects of exposures and effects of interventions in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic, with minimal restrictions on the types of study design to be included. The outcomes assessed will be death by suicide; self-harm or attempted suicide (including hospital attendance and/or admission for these reasons); and suicidal thoughts/ideation. There will be no restriction on study type, except for single case reports. There will be no restriction on language of publication. The review will be updated at three-monthly intervals if a sufficient volume of new evidence justifies doing so.

Please see the “Results” tab to view a summary of the current evidence.