Last updated: 2019-03-31

Checks: 6 0

Knit directory: fiveMinuteStats/analysis/

This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.2.0). The Report tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.

Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.

Great job! The global environment was empty. Objects defined in the global environment can affect the analysis in your R Markdown file in unknown ways. For reproduciblity it’s best to always run the code in an empty environment.

The command set.seed(12345) was run prior to running the code in the R Markdown file. Setting a seed ensures that any results that rely on randomness, e.g. subsampling or permutations, are reproducible.

Great job! Recording the operating system, R version, and package versions is critical for reproducibility.

Nice! There were no cached chunks for this analysis, so you can be confident that you successfully produced the results during this run.

Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility. The version displayed above was the version of the Git repository at the time these results were generated.

Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish or wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:


Ignored files:
Ignored:    .Rhistory
Ignored:    .Rproj.user/
Ignored:    analysis/.Rhistory
Ignored:    analysis/bernoulli_poisson_process_cache/

Untracked files:
Untracked:  _workflowr.yml
Untracked:  analysis/CI.Rmd
Untracked:  analysis/gibbs_structure.Rmd
Untracked:  analysis/libs/
Untracked:  analysis/results.Rmd
Untracked:  analysis/shiny/tester/
Untracked:  docs/MH_intro_files/
Untracked:  docs/citations.bib
Untracked:  docs/hmm_files/
Untracked:  docs/libs/
Untracked:  docs/shiny/tester/



Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.

These are the previous versions of the R Markdown and HTML files. If you’ve configured a remote Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote), click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view them.

File Version Author Date Message
Rmd 0045156 stephens999 2017-03-23 merge conflicts
html 0045156 stephens999 2017-03-23 merge conflicts
html 34bcc51 John Blischak 2017-03-06 Build site.
Rmd 5fbc8b5 John Blischak 2017-03-06 Update workflowr project with wflow_update (version 0.4.0).
Rmd 391ba3c John Blischak 2017-03-06 Remove front and end matter of non-standard templates.
html fb0f6e3 stephens999 2017-03-03 Merge pull request #33 from mdavy86/f/review
html c8fc444 stephens999 2017-03-02 Build site.
Rmd 095844f stephens999 2017-03-02 Files commited by wflow_commit.
html c3b365a John Blischak 2017-01-02 Build site.
Rmd 67a8575 John Blischak 2017-01-02 Use external chunk to set knitr chunk options.
Rmd 5ec12c7 John Blischak 2017-01-02 Use session-info chunk.
Rmd 153e684 stephens999 2016-05-02 add IS

# Definition

Suppose we want to compute the expectation of a function $$f(X)$$ with respect to a distribution with density $$p(x)$$. So $I = \int f(x) p(x) dx.$ That is $I = E[f(X)]$ where the expectation is taken over a random variable $$X$$ with density $$p$$. We could approximate $$I$$ by “naive simulation”: $I \approx (1/M) \sum_{m} f(X_m)$ where $$X_1,\dots,X_M \sim p(x)$$.

Now let $$q(x)$$ denote any other density function that is non-zero whenever $$p(x)$$ is non-zero. (We need this condition to avoid dividing by 0 in what follows). Then we can rewrite this as $I = \int f(x) [p(x)/q(x)] q(x) dx.$

That is $I = E[ f(X)p(X)/q(X)]$ where the expectation is taken over a random variable X with density $$q$$. So we could also approximate $$I$$ by simulation: $I \approx (1/M) \sum_{m} f(X'_m)p(X'_m)/q(X'_m)$ where $$X'_1,\dots,X'_m \sim q(x)$$.

This is called “Importance Sampling” (IS) and $$q$$ is called the “Importance sampling function”.

The idea behind IS is that if $$q$$ is well chosen then the approximation to $$I$$ will be better than the naive approximation.

# Examples

Suppose $$X \sim N(0,1)$$, and we want to compute $$\Pr(X>z)$$ for $$z = 10$$. That is, $$f(x) = I(x>10)$$ and $$p(x)= \phi(x)$$ is the density of the standard normal distribution.

Let’s try naive simulation,
and compare it with the “truth”, as ascertained by the R function pnorm.

  set.seed(100)
X = rnorm(100000)
mean(1*(X>10))
[1] 0
  pnorm(10,lower.tail=FALSE)
[1] 7.619853e-24

You can see the problem with naive simulation: all the simulations are less than 10 (where f(x)=0), so you don’t get any precision.

Now we use IS. Here we code the general case for $$z$$, using IS function $$q$$ to be $$N(z,1)$$. Note that because of this choice of $$q$$ many of the samples are $$>z$$, where $$f$$ is non-zero, and we hope to get better precision. Of course, we could do this problem much better ways… this is just a toy illustration of IS.

pnorm.IS= function(z,nsamp=100000){
y = rnorm(nsamp,z,1)
w = exp(dnorm(y,0,1,log=TRUE) - dnorm(y,z,1, log=TRUE))
mean(w*(y>z))
}
pnorm.IS(10)
[1] 7.673529e-24
pnorm(10,lower.tail=FALSE)
[1] 7.619853e-24

# Example: computing with means on log scale

We just push this example a bit further, to illustrate a numerical issue that can arise quite generally (not just for IS).

Let’s try the above with $$z=100$$.

pnorm.IS(100)
[1] 0
pnorm(100,lower.tail=FALSE)
[1] 0

Hmmm.. we are having numerical issues.

The trick to solving this is doing things on log scale. But the IS formula involves averaging, and we have to do the averaging on the raw scale, not the log scale. This function allows us to do this. Perhaps you can work out what is going on here?

#function to find the log of the mean of exp(lx).
lmean=function(lx){
m = max(lx)
m + log(mean(exp(lx-m)))
}

Exploiting this we can now do IS for $$z=100$$:

lpnorm.IS= function(z,nsamp=100000){
y = rnorm(nsamp,z,1)
w = dnorm(y,0,1,log=TRUE) - dnorm(y,z,1, log=TRUE)
log(mean(y>z)) + lmean(w[y>z])
}
lpnorm.IS(100)
[1] -5005.571
pnorm(100,lower.tail=FALSE,log=TRUE)
[1] -5005.524

sessionInfo()
R version 3.5.2 (2018-12-20)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS Mojave 10.14.1

Matrix products: default
BLAS: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.5/Resources/lib/libRblas.0.dylib
LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.5/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib

locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8

attached base packages:
[1] stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods   base

loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] workflowr_1.2.0 Rcpp_1.0.0      digest_0.6.18   rprojroot_1.3-2
[5] backports_1.1.3 git2r_0.24.0    magrittr_1.5    evaluate_0.12
[9] stringi_1.2.4   fs_1.2.6        whisker_0.3-2   rmarkdown_1.11
[13] tools_3.5.2     stringr_1.3.1   glue_1.3.0      xfun_0.4
[17] yaml_2.2.0      compiler_3.5.2  htmltools_0.3.6 knitr_1.21     

This site was created with R Markdown