Last updated: 2021-07-07

Checks: 6 1

Knit directory: website/

This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.6.2). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.

R Markdown file: uncommitted changes

The R Markdown file has unstaged changes. To know which version of the R Markdown file created these results, you’ll want to first commit it to the Git repo. If you’re still working on the analysis, you can ignore this warning. When you’re finished, you can run wflow_publish to commit the R Markdown file and build the HTML.

Environment: empty

Great job! The global environment was empty. Objects defined in the global environment can affect the analysis in your R Markdown file in unknown ways. For reproduciblity it’s best to always run the code in an empty environment.

Seed: set.seed(20201030)

The command set.seed(20201030) was run prior to running the code in the R Markdown file. Setting a seed ensures that any results that rely on randomness, e.g. subsampling or permutations, are reproducible.

Session information: recorded

Great job! Recording the operating system, R version, and package versions is critical for reproducibility.

Cache: none

Nice! There were no cached chunks for this analysis, so you can be confident that you successfully produced the results during this run.

File paths: relative

Great job! Using relative paths to the files within your workflowr project makes it easier to run your code on other machines.

Repository version: 10e4f10

Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility.

The results in this page were generated with repository version 10e4f10. See the Past versions tab to see a history of the changes made to the R Markdown and HTML files.

Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish or wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated: 


Ignored files:
    Ignored:    .Rhistory
    Ignored:    .Rproj.user/
    Ignored:    commands.R

Unstaged changes:
    Modified:   analysis/LatestUpdates.Rmd

Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.

These are the previous versions of the repository in which changes were made to the R Markdown (analysis/LatestUpdates.Rmd) and HTML (docs/LatestUpdates.html) files. If you’ve configured a remote Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote), click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view the files as they were in that past version.

File Version Author Date Message
html 6b05077 Lena Schmidt 2021-05-20 Build site.
Rmd 41a8095 Lena Schmidt 2021-05-20 Update of screening status, Updated at 2021-05-20 14:47:37
html 41a8095 Lena Schmidt 2021-05-20 Update of screening status, Updated at 2021-05-20 14:47:37
html 821a005 Lena Schmidt 2021-05-20 Build site.
Rmd c6cc474 Lena Schmidt 2021-05-20 Update of screening status, Updated at 2021-05-20 14:45:25
html c6cc474 Lena Schmidt 2021-05-20 Update of screening status, Updated at 2021-05-20 14:45:25
html 1766206 Lena Schmidt 2021-05-20 Build site.
Rmd 78f494e Lena Schmidt 2021-05-20 Update of screening status, Updated at 2021-05-20 14:43:29
html 78f494e Lena Schmidt 2021-05-20 Update of screening status, Updated at 2021-05-20 14:43:29
html c31a64c Lena Schmidt 2021-05-19 Build site.
Rmd 192ac3f Lena Schmidt 2021-05-19 Updated text after publication of base review, Updated at 2021-05-19 16:31:58
html 192ac3f Lena Schmidt 2021-05-19 Updated text after publication of base review, Updated at 2021-05-19 16:31:58
html db43913 Lena Schmidt 2021-05-19 Build site.
Rmd 0194d67 Lena Schmidt 2021-05-19 Updated text after publication of base review, Updated at 2021-05-19 16:31:58
html 0194d67 Lena Schmidt 2021-05-19 Updated text after publication of base review, Updated at 2021-05-19 16:31:58
html 21b1c0f L-ENA 2020-11-13 Build site.
html a8b35d4 L-ENA 2020-11-13 Updated figures, Updated at 2020-11-13 19:19:40
html 45aa0d5 L-ENA 2020-11-13 Build site.
Rmd 8e98482 L-ENA 2020-11-13 Added PRISMA, Updated at 2020-11-13 19:08:02
html 8e98482 L-ENA 2020-11-13 Added PRISMA, Updated at 2020-11-13 19:08:02
html ed31ccb L-ENA 2020-11-06 Build site.
Rmd eadb69b L-ENA 2020-11-06 Updated at 2020-11-06 09:50:51
html eadb69b L-ENA 2020-11-06 Updated at 2020-11-06 09:50:51
html a34fbc8 L-ENA 2020-10-30 Build site.
html b5505f2 L-ENA 2020-10-30 Build site.
html 93bdfca L-ENA 2020-10-30 Build site.
Rmd f625ab4 L-ENA 2020-10-30 added interactive plots
html f625ab4 L-ENA 2020-10-30 added interactive plots
html 7bafffe L-ENA 2020-10-30 Build site.
Rmd ef0354d L-ENA 2020-10-30 add
html ef0354d L-ENA 2020-10-30 add
html 26e1d9b L-ENA 2020-10-30 Build site.
html c16ec66 L-ENA 2020-10-30 Build site.
html c86cb34 L-ENA 2020-10-30 Build site.
Rmd 69afb05 L-ENA 2020-10-30 license updated

Latest published version: Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: A living systematic review (version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review)

This page contains the latest updates to this living review. We have screened and continued the work on this review, a status update and resources are given below.

Screening status after publication of base-review

Latest references retrieved: 02-11-2020 (PubMed, arXiv); 02-11-2020 (DBLP)

Number of abstracts retrieved: 1376

Number of abstracts screened: 232

Number of abstracts sent for full-text assessment: 9

Number of full-texts included: 0

Number of full-texts excluded: 0

PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for the base review

This is the PRISMA diagram for the first version (base review) of this living review.

The PRISMA diagrams were created using Haddaway, NR. 2020. SRflowdiagram: flow charts for systematic reviews and maps. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4134795

Latest figures

These figures represent pre-update, and therefore unpublished, content from the living review.


sessionInfo()
R version 4.0.3 (2020-10-10)
Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit)
Running under: Windows 10 x64 (build 19041)

Matrix products: default

locale:
[1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252 
[2] LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252   
[3] LC_MONETARY=English_United States.1252
[4] LC_NUMERIC=C                          
[5] LC_TIME=English_United States.1252    

attached base packages:
[1] stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods   base     

loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
 [1] Rcpp_1.0.5      rstudioapi_0.13 whisker_0.4     knitr_1.30     
 [5] magrittr_1.5    workflowr_1.6.2 R6_2.5.0        rlang_0.4.8    
 [9] stringr_1.4.0   tools_4.0.3     xfun_0.19       git2r_0.27.1   
[13] htmltools_0.5.0 ellipsis_0.3.1  yaml_2.2.1      digest_0.6.27  
[17] rprojroot_2.0.2 tibble_3.0.4    lifecycle_0.2.0 crayon_1.3.4   
[21] later_1.1.0.1   vctrs_0.3.4     promises_1.1.1  fs_1.5.0       
[25] glue_1.4.2      evaluate_0.14   rmarkdown_2.5   stringi_1.5.3  
[29] compiler_4.0.3  pillar_1.4.6    httpuv_1.5.4    pkgconfig_2.0.3