Last updated: 2022-08-25
Checks: 7 0
This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.6.2). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.
Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.
Great job! The global environment was empty. Objects defined in the global environment can affect the analysis in your R Markdown file in unknown ways. For reproduciblity it’s best to always run the code in an empty environment.
set.seed(20200602) was run prior to running the code in the R Markdown file. Setting a seed ensures that any results that rely on randomness, e.g. subsampling or permutations, are reproducible.
Great job! Recording the operating system, R version, and package versions is critical for reproducibility.
Nice! There were no cached chunks for this analysis, so you can be confident that you successfully produced the results during this run.
Great job! Using relative paths to the files within your workflowr project makes it easier to run your code on other machines.
Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility.
The results in this page were generated with repository version 9586e81. See the Past versions tab to see a history of the changes made to the R Markdown and HTML files.
Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use
wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:
working directory clean
Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.
These are the previous versions of the repository in which changes were made to the R Markdown (
analysis/publications.Rmd) and HTML (
publications.html) files. If you’ve configured a remote Git repository (see
?wflow_git_remote), click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view the files as they were in that past version.
|html||526de12||Lena Schmidt||2021-06-18||Build site.|
|Rmd||2d46708||Lena Schmidt||2021-06-18||Updated review publication|
|html||86e5ea3||Kazeem Olorisade||2020-09-24||author names corrected|
|html||9bc005b||Kazeem Olorisade||2020-09-24||add publication info|
|html||e029a6e||Kazeem Olorisade||2020-07-06||protocol sec updated|
|html||844871c||Kazeem Olorisade||2020-07-06||protocol info updated_2|
|html||10c1563||Kazeem Olorisade||2020-07-06||protocol info updated|
|html||d0605dc||Kazeem Olorisade||2020-07-06||protocol info updated|
|Rmd||2965302||L-ENA||2020-06-03||Publications visual update|
|Rmd||ddfde26||L-ENA||2020-06-03||Added publication and citation info|
The latest living review update was published on June 18, 2021 via F1000 research. This updated version replaced the previous versions of this living review: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: update of living systematic review (version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations). Please cite as:
Ann John, Emily Eyles, Roger T. Webb, Chukwudi Okolie, Lena Schmidt, Ella Arensman, Keith Hawton, Rory C. O’Connor, Nav Kapur, Paul Moran, Siobhan O’Neill, Luke A. McGuinness, Babatunde K. Olorisade, Dana Dekel, Catherine Macleod-Hall, Hung-Yuan Cheng, Julian P.T. Higgins, David Gunnell. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: update of living systematic review [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2021, 9:1097 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25522.2)
The review protocol was published via F1000 research : The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: protocol for a living systematic review. Please cite as:
John, A; Okolie, C; Eyles, E; Webb, RT; Schmidt, L; McGuiness, LA; Olorisade, BK; Arensman, E; Hawton, K; Kapur, N; Moran, P; O’Connor, RC; O’Neill, S; Higgins, JPT; Gunnell, D. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: protocol for a living systematic review [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2020, 9:644 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.24274.1)
The review was registered prospectively on PROSPERO on May 1st 2020 under CRD42020183326:
Ann John, David Gunnell, Julian Higgins, Emily Eyles, Luke McGuinness, Chukwudi Okolie, Kazeem Olorisade, Lena Schmidt. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: a living systematic review. PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020183326. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020183326
Luke McGuinness and Lena Schmidt. mcguinlu/COVID_suicide_living: Initial Release (Version v1.0.0). Zenodo 2020. Available from: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3871366